R
Richard
Richard Heathfield said:Richard said:
I have already said that his article was topical, so my desires are
neither
Well, finally you have. It seemed on topic enough to most others.
here nor there. I have also already explained my meaning sufficiently
clearly, I think. See quoted text, above.
No. You said that it was his fault that you are unable to read/check his
code. "He missed a trick" to borrow your excuse. Well, he didn't miss
any trick. Because you are clearly unable or unwilling to check out C99
compliant code as you have repeatedly stated - and that is what his code
is - C99. So he missed no tricks at all.
--