Access to variable from external imported module

[GinTon]

How to access to a variable (that value is not returned) from a module
imported?
And the variable is set at the module-level.

That module is external to my program, it's from another project so I
wann't modifying it.

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

How to access to a variable (that value is not returned) from a module
imported?
And the variable is set at the module-level.

import module
print module.variable

(have you read the Python tutorial?)

</F>

 

[GinTon]

Sorry, I mean access to local variable from a method

import module
method(value)

I would to access to values that are created locally in that method

Fredrik Lundh ha escrito:

 

[robert]

Sorry, I mean access to local variable from a method

import module
method(value)

I would to access to values that are created locally in that method

after the method has executed? usually the return value?
or you want to get all local variables, then make a func/method

def f(a=1):
b=2
c=3
return locals() #X/Object(locals())


--------


d=module.f()
print d['c'] # d.c





Robert

 

[Bjoern Schliessmann]

Sorry, I mean access to local variable from a method

import module
method(value)

That's no access to a local variable of a method. It's a simple
function call.

I would to access to values that are created locally in that
method

Something with your interface seems horribly wrong.

Regards,


Björn

 

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

GinTon a écrit :

Sorry, I mean access to local variable from a method

One of the most surprising properties of local variables is that they
are, well... local.

 

[GinTon]

Thanks Robert, the best solution is get all local variables, else is
impossible access to them.

robert ha escrito:

 

[jim-on-linux]

GinTon,

I think this is what you want.


class Kdoi:
   def __init__(self) :    
       self.Fdo()

   def Fdo(self):

searchterm = 'help'
print searchterm #local

     self.searchterm = searchterm
     print self.searchterm #used inside the class

     Kdo.searchterm = searchterm #<<<<
     print Kdo.searchterm #used outside the class
Kdomore()


   
class Kdomore(Kdo):
def __init__(self) :
self.Fdomore()

def Fdomore(self):
searchterm = Kdo.searchterm # <<<<
print searchterm



jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

Thanks Robert, the best solution is get all local variables, else is
impossible access to them.

if you don't want them to be local, why are you using local variables?

(have you read the Python tutorial?)

</F>

 

[John Machin]

GinTon,

I think this is what you want.


class Kdoi:

Is that a typo?

def __init__(self) :
self.Fdo()

What is all this K and F stuff?

def Fdo(self):

searchterm = 'help'
print searchterm #local

self.searchterm = searchterm
print self.searchterm #used inside the class

Kdo.searchterm = searchterm #<<<<
print Kdo.searchterm #used outside the class
Kdomore()



class Kdomore(Kdo):
def __init__(self) :
self.Fdomore()

def Fdomore(self):
searchterm = Kdo.searchterm # <<<<
print searchterm

It's not apparent what the print statements are for -- are they part of
an attempt to debug your code?

What gives you the idea that this is what the OP wants or needs?

 

[robert]

Thanks Robert, the best solution is get all local variables, else is
impossible access to them.

For test purposes/ex post inspection you could also uncomment the line in:

def f(a=1):
b=2
c=3
#globals().update(locals())
return a+b
--

then it is more easy and you can get it like:

module.c


You can also create a total stack trace dynamically with this trick function:

def mktb():
try: raise UserWarning
except: return sys.exc_info()[2]

def f(a=1):
b=2
c=3
global ftb;ftb=mktb()
return a+b
----

and then fully inspect the total situation in the func (and all down the call history) ex post at any time with


Which other programming language can do things like this?
( Unfortunately (legacy) Python has no possibility to (re-)continue execution from exceptions/traces other than by simple generators )

Robert

robert ha escrito:

 

[jim-on-linux]

Is that a typo?

No, it's a style. life seems to be easier
to me if one is consistent, all my classes begin
with K.

What is all this K and F stuff?

It's my style. life seems to be easier to me
if one is consistent all my function begin with
F.

I started doing things like this when the only way
to debug was to read each line of code and try to
figgure out if it was the problem.
They are my personal sign posts.

It's not apparent what the print statements are
for -- are they part of an attempt to debug
your code?

print shows the results wherever a print statement
turns up the results = 'help' .
I didn't run the code, and it has it has a coding
error but if removed, the results should be;

searchterm = 'help'
self.searchterm = 'help'
Kdo.searchterm = 'help'

Sound silly but many people have trouble with
getting a variable from here to there in their
code. This shows that it can be done

What gives you the idea that this is what the
OP wants or needs?

If I remember right, he refrased his first
question and asked a second one.
Sometimes people don't take the time to write
correctly, the questions that are really in their
mind. So I guessed. If Im wrong, he will ignore
it. If I'm right, he will use it.

Also, I have found that other will latch on to the
ideas presented in these email responses. And
they will use them, even though the response was
not exactly what the original emailer wanted.

And, I sometimes I do use print statements to
debug, I have used other ways but on linux, I
prefer a print statement.

jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com

 

[jim-on-linux]

No, it's a style. life seems to be
easier to me if one is consistent, all my
classes begin with K.

Sorry, Kdoi should be Kod

It's my style. life seems to be easier to
me if one is consistent all my function begin
with F.

I started doing things like this when the only
way to debug was to read each line of code and
try to figgure out if it was the problem.
They are my personal sign posts.

the line above should be Kdomore(), not class
Kdomore() (For the technocrats)

print shows the results wherever a print
statement turns up the results = 'help' .
I didn't run the code, and it has it has a
coding error but if removed, the results should
be;

searchterm = 'help'
self.searchterm = 'help'
Kdo.searchterm = 'help'

Sound silly but many people have trouble
with getting a variable from here to there in
their code. This shows that it can be done


If I remember right, he refrased his first
question and asked a second one.
Sometimes people don't take the time to write
correctly, the questions that are really in
their mind. So I guessed. If Im wrong, he will
ignore it. If I'm right, he will use it.

Also, I have found that other will latch on to
the ideas presented in these email responses.
And they will use them, even though the
response was not exactly what the original
emailer wanted.

And, I sometimes I do use print statements to
debug, I have used other ways but on linux, I
prefer a print statement.

jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com

 

[John Machin]

No, it's a style. life seems to be easier
to me if one is consistent, all my classes begin
with K.

and end with "i"?

It's my style. life seems to be easier to me
if one is consistent all my function begin with
F.

You left out a word; the correct way of phrasing that is: "All my
function _are_ begin with F"

This appears to be a variation on "Hungarian notation"; google that for
opinions pro & con.

In a certain vernacular, it would be called "an effed concept"

I started doing things like this when the only way
to debug was to read each line of code and try to
figgure out if it was the problem.

When was that? Even years ago, there were slightly better ways. For
example, my first boss' boss was an enthusiastic coder and debugger and
also a workaholic. Colleagues who lived along the same railway line as
he and were foolish enough not to hide behind a newspaper could have
their morning or evening reverie disturbed by a cry of "Glad you're
here! I'll hold the listing, you hold the dump!". I get the impression
that debugging techniques have moved along a little bit since then.

They are my personal sign posts.
print shows the results wherever a print statement
turns up the results = 'help' .
I didn't run the code, and it has it has a coding
error

I noticed.

but if removed, the results should be;

searchterm = 'help'
self.searchterm = 'help'
Kdo.searchterm = 'help'

No, the result would be
help
help
help

Plug in a text-to-speech module and a phone dialer and you're done ;-)

Sound silly but many people have trouble with
getting a variable from here to there in their
code. This shows that it can be done


If I remember right, he refrased his first
question and asked a second one.
Sometimes people don't take the time to write
correctly, the questions that are really in their
mind. So I guessed. If Im wrong, he will ignore
it. If I'm right, he will use it.

With luck. Kindly consider another possibility: that you are wrong (or
just marching to the beat of your own tambourine) and he (or she) is a
newbie & will use it

[snip]

HTH,
John

 

[jim-on-linux]

Sorry, Kdoi should be Kod

Sorry again Kdoi should be Kdo
(Haste makes waste.)

the line above should be Kdomore(), not class
Kdomore() (For the technocrats)

jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com

 

[jim-on-linux]

and end with "i"?


You left out a word; the correct way of
phrasing that is: "All my function _are_ begin
with F"

No, for Non-Hungrian programmers it's "all-ah me"
Functions gona begin witha F, not Func. anda
"all-ah-me" classes gona begin witha K, not Klas.
Anda only me gona Know the Fdiff cause me codea is
not opena. Anda I finda that it savea me time
causea I doa thisa way fora a longa time.

Whena I gonna hava to changea maybe I willa.

This appears to be a variation on "Hungarian
notation"; google that for opinions pro & con.

In a certain vernacular, it would be called "an
effed concept"


When was that?

That was when bill gates just left Harvard,
basic was brand new, and 4k of memory was
installed free when you bought a computer,
(TRS80), my first,. Assemble was the alternative
to Basic and you had to backup on tape because
floppies didn't exist. And, most people on this
site wern't even a gleem in their fathers eye.

Even years ago, there were
slightly better ways. For example, my first
boss' boss was an enthusiastic coder and
debugger and also a workaholic. Colleagues who
lived along the same railway line as he and
were foolish enough not to hide behind a
newspaper could have their morning or evening
reverie disturbed by a cry of "Glad you're
here! I'll hold the listing, you hold the
dump!". I get the impression that debugging
techniques have moved along a little bit since
then.


I noticed.

Correct but when writing one must be clear.

Would it be better for me to write, your question
above was Is that a typo?

Or is it better if I were to write, your
question above, "Is that a typo?",
is a legimate question, but not clear.

So, to be clear one might write is "Kdoi"
correct?.

A clear response would be, it is not "Kdoi", it is
"Kdo".

But that's not correct either, it is Kdo.

If one runs the code I don't expect the user to
look for "help", I think we will see help and
will THINK that the results are correct.

THINK is also incorrect, it should be written.
think, or should it?

No, the result would be
help
help
help

Plug in a text-to-speech module and a phone
dialer and you're done ;-)


With luck. Kindly consider another possibility:
that you are wrong (or just marching to the
beat of your own tambourine) and he (or she) is
a newbie & will use it

"Because he being of course judge of that tendency
will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and
approve or condemn the sentiments of others only
as they shall square with or differ from his own…"
Thomas Jefferson



I enjoied this, but time is money,

jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com

 

[Dennis Lee Bieber]

That was when bill gates just left Harvard,
basic was brand new, and 4k of memory was

Pardon? I'd learned BASIC back around 1972, in the 9th grade, using
an ASR-33 with dial-up to some company's Honeywell-Bull system.

BASIC is one of the ancients in languages, predating Pascal and C.

Just because Gates managed to scrabble together a BASIC interpreter
for the MITS Altair, and then had it picked up by other makers of
8080/Z-80 based "microcomputers" doesn't make it "brand new".
(Personally, I suspect he hasn't done any programming ever since that
day, and is probably still trying to find some way to sue Kemeny&Kurtz
(sp?s) over their own creation)
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber KD6MOG
(e-mail address removed) (e-mail address removed)
HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
(Bestiaria Support Staff: (e-mail address removed))
HTTP://www.bestiaria.com/

 

[Steven D'Aprano]

Correct but when writing one must be clear.

[jaw drops]

Given the number of typos your posts include, the mock accent, the
nonsensical sentences, the annoying hard-to-read coding conventions, and
the sheer number of grammatical errors in your sentences, do you have any
idea of the irony of that statement?

No, I imagine you don't.

Oh, and don't flatter yourself that you're the Old Man of Programming,
compared to all the young whipper snappers on this list who, quote,
"wern't even a gleem in their fathers eye". Many of us have been around
quite a while, some of us even remember that there was a computer market
before Bill Gates went dumpster-diving for source-code for a BASIC
interpreter, and even if we weren't, there is nothing to be proud of using
1970s programming style in 2000s programming languages.

 

[jim-on-linux]

The TRS-80 I bought came with both Basic and
Assembly Language teaching guides, and that was
it. To make the machine work one had to program.
I didn't mean to imply that Bill Gates developed
it. It's well known that MS borrowed stuff when
they needed to from where ever the could get it.
That's business.

I'm not an MS fan but Bill Gates was the one who
gave away a very cheep, borrowed but improved,
copy of DOS to computer sellers. These copies
could also be copied to floppies (8 inch). So,
DOS 3.3 was used by computer sellers, to install
DOS on the buyers machine, (intel 286) free.

On the other hand, IBM sold the same package for
$50.00.

I got the free copy of MS 3.3 with my 286.

After that, Windows 3.0 cost me $25.00,
Windows 3.1 cost me $30.00,
DOS upgrade from3.3 to 6.22 cost
me $55.00.
Since then I purchased Win 95, $100.00
and Win 98. $125.00.
And, all for testing software that I produced for
people that use that stuff.

Bill Gates probably can't program any software to
write "Hello World" on any screen, but I'll bet
he knows how to fill out a deposit ticket.

I think Bill Gates recognize early that the money
is in the marketing of the product, not the
programming of it. How else can you explain the
success of Windows, like it or not?

jim-on-linux
http://www.inqvista.com