M
Mark Aurit
I have an intranet application that uses w2k Integrated
Windows Authentication to authenticate users. We now have
a situation where people will be accessing it who are on
our network but will not be logged into w2k - so now they
are challenged and fail the challenge.
To handle that situation I plan to use iis custom errors
with one of the 401 codes to redirect the user to a
generic page.
The problem is that I cant figure out how to exactly
simulate the problem on my local machine for development,
as by definition Im of course logged into my own computer.
Ive decided to put basic authentication on the folder
where the authentication occurs, and then fail its
challenge, use the redirect, etc. Once this works, then
hopefully I can made some minor changes and use it with
Integrated Windows.
My question is whether this will be a valid simulation:
do those 2 authentication systems work in the same manner
with custom errors? In other words, I dont want to write
a solution for basic auth that doesnt work (with minor
tweaks - for example Im not sure if the same http error is
thrown) with integrated auth.
Thanks, Mark
Windows Authentication to authenticate users. We now have
a situation where people will be accessing it who are on
our network but will not be logged into w2k - so now they
are challenged and fail the challenge.
To handle that situation I plan to use iis custom errors
with one of the 401 codes to redirect the user to a
generic page.
The problem is that I cant figure out how to exactly
simulate the problem on my local machine for development,
as by definition Im of course logged into my own computer.
Ive decided to put basic authentication on the folder
where the authentication occurs, and then fail its
challenge, use the redirect, etc. Once this works, then
hopefully I can made some minor changes and use it with
Integrated Windows.
My question is whether this will be a valid simulation:
do those 2 authentication systems work in the same manner
with custom errors? In other words, I dont want to write
a solution for basic auth that doesnt work (with minor
tweaks - for example Im not sure if the same http error is
thrown) with integrated auth.
Thanks, Mark