But perfect programs don't need an improved typechecking system. It already
works, so we should leave it alone.
Nor do they need to be made Y2K compliant, or deal with the 2038
epoch, or with long filenames, or with supersize files or with
changing inputs...
hmm. There's a flaw here somewhere...
Yes, quite true. The "reward" I spoke of was in relation to the code
rewritten in the process (under the assumption that it's perfect, of
course), not the developers doing the rewriting...
I wasn't aware code had emotions, let alone felt rewarded by being
perfect!
I should have been less ambiguous.
er...
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan