A
Andy Dingley
Travis said:Hardly a useful comparison. The entertainment industry and Flash are a
marrage made in Heaven.
So are pr0n sites and spammers.
Travis said:Hardly a useful comparison. The entertainment industry and Flash are a
marrage made in Heaven.
Andy said:So are pr0n sites and spammers.
Travis said:Hardly a useful comparison. The entertainment industry and Flash are a
marrage made in Heaven.
Jonathan said:Think you missed my point, the issue was not about Flash.
Andy said:Travis Newbury wrote:
The trouble with that as a statement is that too many will read it as
"IE" and that's no test at all. It's not even much better if you use IE
_and_ FF -- what about validation?
Dave said:Welcome to Mozilla 1.7 for Sun Java™ Desktop System
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/2006012
Travis said:We have no problems finding work. (We create Flash based WEB
applications for the entertainment industry)
I know the exact reason for the validation errors. It is Flash and the
object tag. And because of interaction between flash objects, we can
not use that validating workaround as IE is forced to load the entire
object before it runs and we need the interaction to start running
from the moment the Flash start to load.
http://edmullen.net/fclock.html
That page does validate at w3.org as 4.01 Strict.
Also,http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/
Just FYI, not sure if this addresses all the issues you have with
validating HTML with a Flash object.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.