Buying the ISO 14882-2003 Standard

M

ManicQin

Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available.  It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...
 
J

Juha Nieminen

ManicQin said:
Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?
 
H

hurcan solter

Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/cpp/INCITS+ISO+IEC+14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Thanks...

I use working drafts from
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/

Non-existent section in c++03

14.5.3 Variadic templates [temp.variadic]

1 A template parameter pack is a template parameter that accepts zero
or more template arguments. [ Example:

template<class ... Types> struct Tuple { };

Tuple<> t0; // Types contains no arguments
Tuple<int> t1; // Types contains one argument: int
Tuple<int, float> t2; // Types contains two arguments: int and float
Tuple<0> eror; // error: 0 is not a type

—end example ]

this is bleeding edge c++ for you !!
 
S

subramanian100in

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

Kindly reply

Thanks
V.Subramanian
 
R

red floyd

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.
 
M

ManicQin

Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?

I think that they should be rewarded for they're effort. No?
Besides its a symbol of status, Rappers have Bling Blings and we've
got STD ;)
 
S

subramanian100in

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.


My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version. I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian
 
S

subramanian100in

Say, what in "2003 is the latest official standard" do you not understand?
Which word in that statement confuses you? The "latest" or the "official"?



Kindly reread red floyd's reply.




V

I get it now. C++98 plus Technical Corrigendum 1 is ISO 2003. Am I
correct.

I am reading TC++PL 3rd edition by Stroustrup which was published
before ISO C++ 2003. Is it sufficient ?. I request you to suggest some
books which are compliant with ISO C++ 2003 which I can read. Also is
there a g++ compiler which is ISO C++ 2003 compliant.

Has Stroustrup written any book on ISO C++ 2003 ?

Also please let me know the url for Technical Corrigendum 1 document
so that I can read it and update myself with the changes later that C+
+98.

Kindly help.

Thanks
V.Subramanian
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,764
Messages
2,569,564
Members
45,040
Latest member
papereejit

Latest Threads

Top