C++ Standards

Discussion in 'C++' started by rkldabs@gmail.com, Jul 23, 2008.

  1. Guest

    Hi,

    I would like to know about some of the terminology of the C++
    standards.

    As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
    by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URL http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
    indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
    correct? I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

    Regards,
    Dabs.
     
    , Jul 23, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <> wrote:
    > On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, said:
    >
    >
    >
    > > As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
    > > by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
    > > indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
    > > correct?

    >
    > Yes.
    >
    > >  I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

    >
    > They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
    > track of what's what.
    >
    > --
    >   Pete
    > Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
    > Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
    > (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)


    Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
    of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
    consideration.

    Thanks
     
    puzzlecracker, Jul 23, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Ian Collins Guest

    puzzlecracker wrote:
    > On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <> wrote:
    >> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, said:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
    >>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
    >>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
    >>> correct?

    >> Yes.
    >>
    >>> I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

    >> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
    >> track of what's what.
    >>

    *Please* don't quote signatures.
    >
    > Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
    > of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
    > consideration.
    >

    You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
    published document. For now, check the draft.

    --
    Ian Collins.
     
    Ian Collins, Jul 23, 2008
    #3
  4. Ian Collins schrieb:

    > You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
    > published document. For now, check the draft.


    Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?

    Regards,
    Johannes

    --
    "Wer etwas kritisiert muss es noch lange nicht selber besser können. Es
    reicht zu wissen, daß andere es besser können und andere es auch
    besser machen um einen Vergleich zu bringen." - Wolfgang Gerber
    in de.sci.electronics <47fa8447$0$11545$>
     
    Johannes Bauer, Jul 23, 2008
    #4
  5. On Jul 23, 3:02 pm, Pete Becker <> wrote:
    > On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <> said:
    >
    >
    >
    > > On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <> wrote:
    > >> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, said:

    >
    > >>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
    > >>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22

    > > /wg21/
    > >>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
    > >>> correct?

    >
    > >> Yes.

    >
    > >>>  I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

    >
    > >> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
    > >> track of what's what.

    >
    > >> --
    > >>   Pete
    > >> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
    > >> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
    > >> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

    >
    > > Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
    > > of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
    > > consideration.

    >
    > The latest draft standard is N2691.
    >
    > --
    >   Pete
    > Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
    > Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
    > (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)


    link please
     
    puzzlecracker, Jul 23, 2008
    #5
  6. Ian Collins Guest

    Johannes Bauer wrote:
    > Ian Collins schrieb:
    >
    >> You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
    >> published document. For now, check the draft.

    >
    > Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?
    >

    :)

    --
    Ian Collins.
     
    Ian Collins, Jul 24, 2008
    #6
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Jim Culver

    coding standards

    Jim Culver, Sep 9, 2003, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    2,262
  2. shbgupta

    coding standards

    shbgupta, Jun 27, 2003, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    559
    Chance Hopkins
    Jun 27, 2003
  3. Paul G
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    406
    John Timney \(Microsoft MVP\)
    Feb 26, 2004
  4. =?Utf-8?B?bWtsYXBw?=

    Evolving Web App Standards and ASP.NET

    =?Utf-8?B?bWtsYXBw?=, Jul 19, 2004, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    437
    Mr. Dot Net
    Jul 20, 2004
  5. SMG
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    317
Loading...

Share This Page