caching in Application scope

Discussion in 'ASP .Net' started by JL, Nov 19, 2003.

  1. JL

    JL Guest

    I read here a lot of posts saying you shouln't cache un big object or lots
    of objects in Application.

    Why is that?
     
    JL, Nov 19, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Caching stores that data in memory. Pretend you have 64MB of ram on a
    server, and your cache takes up 30MB. This might pose a serious problem for
    your server.


    "JL" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I read here a lot of posts saying you shouln't cache un big object or lots
    > of objects in Application.
    >
    > Why is that?
    >
    >
    >
     
    Manit Chanthavong, Nov 19, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Alvin Bruney

    Alvin Bruney Guest

    in addition application object was provided for backward compatibility with
    asp classic. you should try to get away from using it moving forward.
    regards

    --


    -----------
    Got TidBits?
    Get it here: www.networkip.net/tidbits
    "Manit Chanthavong" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Caching stores that data in memory. Pretend you have 64MB of ram on a
    > server, and your cache takes up 30MB. This might pose a serious problem

    for
    > your server.
    >
    >
    > "JL" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > I read here a lot of posts saying you shouln't cache un big object or

    lots
    > > of objects in Application.
    > >
    > > Why is that?
    > >
    > >
    > >

    >
    >
     
    Alvin Bruney, Nov 19, 2003
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Hypo
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    630
  2. Troy Simpson

    Fragment Caching inside page caching?

    Troy Simpson, Jan 19, 2004, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    955
    Troy Simpson
    Jan 19, 2004
  3. Steve Wark
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    700
    Brock Allen
    May 23, 2005
  4. Paul Opal
    Replies:
    12
    Views:
    1,179
    Paul Opal
    Oct 11, 2004
  5. JimLad
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,129
    JimLad
    Jan 21, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page