S
Suman
Having had a look at the C++ FAQ, comp.lang.c++ & comp.std.c++
archives and Stroustrup's FAQs (particularly the following:
<url:http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#overload-dot/>)
I am left to wondering why Stroustrup doesn't mention the
*_cast<> operators or operator .* in that particular FAQ.
Archived discussions have convinced me that .* _cannot_ be overloaded.
I have gathered a notion (perhaps incorrectly) that the *_cast<>
operators cannot be overloaded as well. Hence this post.
Awaiting enlightenment.
archives and Stroustrup's FAQs (particularly the following:
<url:http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#overload-dot/>)
I am left to wondering why Stroustrup doesn't mention the
*_cast<> operators or operator .* in that particular FAQ.
Archived discussions have convinced me that .* _cannot_ be overloaded.
I have gathered a notion (perhaps incorrectly) that the *_cast<>
operators cannot be overloaded as well. Hence this post.
Awaiting enlightenment.