changes in HTML code are ignored by the browser (IE6)

Discussion in 'HTML' started by aa, Oct 7, 2004.

  1. aa

    aa Guest

    When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the result of a
    javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it is supposed
    to be.

    "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is set to
    "Every visit to the page".
    Temporary internet files have been deleted.

    Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?
     
    aa, Oct 7, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. aa

    Jan Faerber Guest

    aa wrote:

    > When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the result of
    > a javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it is
    > supposed to be.
    >
    > "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is set to
    > "Every visit to the page".
    > Temporary internet files have been deleted.
    >
    > Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?


    What exactly do you mean?
    Do you want to get the *.js file? ....so get it.

    btw: Please - do not multi post!



    --
    Jan

    http://213.47.90.11
     
    Jan Faerber, Oct 7, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. aa

    aa Guest

    Sorry, I do not understand what you mean by "get *.js file", Jan.
    I don't need to get it becase it is already in my PC.
    To be more precise, it is an HTML fule containig JavaScript code and I can
    view it if I open it in Notepad.

    I mean that when I open it in IE6 and then go to VIEW-->Source, I see the
    result of execution of the JS code, whereas I am supposed to see the code
    itself, don't I ?

    "Jan Faerber" <> wrote in message
    news:xg99d.354468$...
    > aa wrote:
    >
    > > When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the result

    of
    > > a javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it is
    > > supposed to be.
    > >
    > > "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is set to
    > > "Every visit to the page".
    > > Temporary internet files have been deleted.
    > >
    > > Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?

    >
    > What exactly do you mean?
    > Do you want to get the *.js file? ....so get it.
    >
    > btw: Please - do not multi post!
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Jan
    >
    > http://213.47.90.11
     
    aa, Oct 7, 2004
    #3
  4. aa

    Jan Faerber Guest

    aa wrote:

    > Sorry, I do not understand what you mean by "get *.js file", Jan.


    I thought you have something like this:
    <script language="JavaScript1.1" SRC="/includes/index/head.js"></script>

    > I don't need to get it becase it is already in my PC.


    OK.

    > To be more precise, it is an HTML fule containig JavaScript code and I
    > can view it if I open it in Notepad.
    >
    > I mean that when I open it in IE6 and then go to VIEW-->Source, I see the
    > result of execution of the JS code, whereas I am supposed to see the code
    > itself, don't I ?


    So you have a html-file with something like this:

    <script type="text/javascript">
    <!--
    document.write("<br>");
    //-->
    </script>

    .... then you see only

    <br>

    ???


    I see:

    <script type="text/javascript">
    <!--
    document.write("<br>");
    //-->
    </script>

    Or is your code more sophisticated?


    --
    Jan

    http://213.47.90.11
     
    Jan Faerber, Oct 7, 2004
    #4
  5. aa

    aa Guest

    1. "So you have a html-file with something like this:
    <script type="text/javascript"> document.write("<br>");</script>
    .... then you see only <br>"

    Exactly.

    2. "Or is your code more sophisticated?"

    It is, but code complexity should not be relevant as long as it does not
    produce errors.
    For the purity of argument, I run <script type="text/javascript">
    document.write("<br>");</script>
    and saw only <br>
    So, what are your ideas?
     
    aa, Oct 7, 2004
    #5
  6. aa

    Jim Higson Guest

    aa wrote:

    > 1. "So you have a html-file with something like this:
    > <script type="text/javascript"> document.write("<br>");</script>
    > ... then you see only <br>"
    >
    > Exactly.
    >
    > 2. "Or is your code more sophisticated?"
    >
    > It is, but code complexity should not be relevant as long as it does not
    > produce errors.
    > For the purity of argument, I run <script type="text/javascript">
    > document.write("<br>");</script>
    > and saw only <br>
    > So, what are your ideas?


    look at the code in a better browser?
     
    Jim Higson, Oct 7, 2004
    #6
  7. aa

    aa Guest

    That's my point.
    The problem is not with the code, but with the browser.
    Either I accidentallt chenged some setting, or, perhaps got a virus - I
    expected someone had similar porblem and would suggest a fix

    "Jim Higson" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > aa wrote:
    >
    > > 1. "So you have a html-file with something like this:
    > > <script type="text/javascript"> document.write("<br>");</script>
    > > ... then you see only <br>"
    > >
    > > Exactly.
    > >
    > > 2. "Or is your code more sophisticated?"
    > >
    > > It is, but code complexity should not be relevant as long as it does not
    > > produce errors.
    > > For the purity of argument, I run <script type="text/javascript">
    > > document.write("<br>");</script>
    > > and saw only <br>
    > > So, what are your ideas?

    >
    > look at the code in a better browser?
    >
     
    aa, Oct 7, 2004
    #7
  8. aa

    Hywel Guest

    In article <4165351e$0$54805$>, aa
    says...
    > "Jan Faerber" <> wrote in message
    > news:xg99d.354468$...
    > > aa wrote:
    > >
    > > > When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the result

    > of
    > > > a javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it is
    > > > supposed to be.
    > > >
    > > > "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is set to
    > > > "Every visit to the page".
    > > > Temporary internet files have been deleted.
    > > >
    > > > Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?

    > >
    > > What exactly do you mean?
    > > Do you want to get the *.js file? ....so get it.
    > >
    > > btw: Please - do not multi post!

    >
    > Sorry


    Learn to quote properly, too. At the *end* of that to which you're
    replying.

    --
    Hywel

    http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/
     
    Hywel, Oct 7, 2004
    #8
  9. aa

    aa Guest

    Hywel,
    If you have nothing to say to the point, you better indulge yourself into
    playng a Victorian teacher elsewhere.
    You are clogging the group by meaningless postings.

    "Hywel" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > In article <4165351e$0$54805$>, aa
    > says...
    > > "Jan Faerber" <> wrote in message
    > > news:xg99d.354468$...
    > > > aa wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the

    result
    > > of
    > > > > a javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it is
    > > > > supposed to be.
    > > > >
    > > > > "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is set

    to
    > > > > "Every visit to the page".
    > > > > Temporary internet files have been deleted.
    > > > >
    > > > > Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?
    > > >
    > > > What exactly do you mean?
    > > > Do you want to get the *.js file? ....so get it.
    > > >
    > > > btw: Please - do not multi post!

    > >
    > > Sorry

    >
    > Learn to quote properly, too. At the *end* of that to which you're
    > replying.
    >
    > --
    > Hywel
    >
    > http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/
     
    aa, Oct 7, 2004
    #9
  10. aa

    Neal Guest

    On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:50:27 +0100, aa <> wrote:

    > Hywel,
    > If you have nothing to say to the point, you better indulge yourself into
    > playng a Victorian teacher elsewhere.
    > You are clogging the group by meaningless postings.


    Top-posting is enforced in many forums due to the nature of discussion. In
    order to facilitate the understanding of the flow of ideas in, say, HTML,
    the normal technique is to post in conversational flow and quote only
    relevant text.

    Hywel's post was not meaningless, it was a very important tip for you to
    get the most out of your discussion here. Please learn to see it that way.
     
    Neal, Oct 7, 2004
    #10
  11. aa

    Toby Inkster Guest

    Toby Inkster, Oct 8, 2004
    #11
  12. aa

    aa Guest

    Hi, boys.
    A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply without
    scrolling down long thread.
    I, however, do not try to impose my preferences on you. Symmetrically, why
    should you? If you do not like my top posting - just don't read and don't
    reply. Tolerance and consideration - this is the main points of Neticette.
    The three of you sent here three messages which has nothing to do with
    either my question or the purpose of this NG. Who is clogging?


    "aa" <> wrote in message
    news:4165b997$0$59465$...
    > Hywel,
    > If you have nothing to say to the point, you better indulge yourself into
    > playng a Victorian teacher elsewhere.
    > You are clogging the group by meaningless postings.
    >
    > "Hywel" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > In article <4165351e$0$54805$>, aa
    > > says...
    > > > "Jan Faerber" <> wrote in message
    > > > news:xg99d.354468$...
    > > > > aa wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > > When I looked into VIEW-->Source code, the source code shows the

    > result
    > > > of
    > > > > > a javascript code execution, not the javascript code itself as it

    is
    > > > > > supposed to be.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > "Check for new versions of stored pages" in Internet options is

    set
    > to
    > > > > > "Every visit to the page".
    > > > > > Temporary internet files have been deleted.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Did I accidentally changed something in my browser settings?
    > > > >
    > > > > What exactly do you mean?
    > > > > Do you want to get the *.js file? ....so get it.
    > > > >
    > > > > btw: Please - do not multi post!
    > > >
    > > > Sorry

    > >
    > > Learn to quote properly, too. At the *end* of that to which you're
    > > replying.
    > >
    > > --
    > > Hywel
    > >
    > > http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/

    >
    >
     
    aa, Oct 8, 2004
    #12
  13. aa

    Neal Guest

    On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:09:19 +0100, aa <> wrote:

    > If you do not like my top posting - just don't read and don't
    > reply.


    Ok. Good luck with your site.

    Plonk.
     
    Neal, Oct 8, 2004
    #13
  14. aa

    rf Guest

    aa wrote:

    > Hi, boys.


    Hmmm. Sexist are we? There are a lot of girls doing this as well. Many of
    them would rip your balls off for that opening.

    > A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply without
    > scrolling down long thread.


    A lot of newbies are fuckwits as well. Top posting is like walking into a
    conversation and shouting an answer before anybody has had a chance to form
    a question.

    > I, however, do not try to impose my preferences on you.


    Yes you do. You do it by continuing to top post.

    > Symmetrically, why
    > should you? If you do not like my top posting - just don't read and don't
    > reply.


    OK. Fine. And you will rapidly find that everybody who knows anything in
    this newsgroup will killfile you. Then what happens the next time you
    *require* an answer to one of your questions and *insist* we toppost that
    answer? You will remain in the dark.

    Insult the regulars: be ignored by them; get answers by the uninformed. Bad
    answers.

    (There are plenty of other newbies here who from time to time answer
    questions. Sometimes they are wrong. They get corrected by those who do
    know. However if the thread has been started by some smartarse like you then
    those who know will simply ignore it. To your and the newbies cost).

    > Tolerance and consideration


    Oh do **** off with this tolerance stuff. The real world does not work that
    way. It's every girl for himself [sic].

    > - this is the main points of Neticette.


    Ah, you must have not read the Netiquette (correct spelling this time)
    wherein you are required to respect the posting conventions of the group to
    which you are posting, and are required to lurk for a week or so before
    barging in with an attitude that would get you arrested on the street, or at
    least punched out :)

    > The three of you sent here three messages which has nothing to do with
    > either my question or the purpose of this NG. Who is clogging?


    You are clogging by being such an arsehole!

    Usenet, especially in that alt.* arena is a discussion. If you get an actual
    answer to your question then that is serendipitous.

    <snip>

    Why did you not snip all of the rest of the stuff that had no relevance to
    your particular post? Wait. I know. You know nothing about Netiquette.

    I see you are making a fool of yourself in other groups as well, like
    comp.lang.php. Careful, those guys over at c.l.* will eat your arse for
    breakfast :)

    --
    Cheers
    Richard.
     
    rf, Oct 8, 2004
    #14
  15. aa

    Karl Core Guest

    "aa" <> wrote in message
    news:4165b997$0$59465$...
    > Hywel,
    > If you have nothing to say to the point, you better indulge yourself into
    > playng a Victorian teacher elsewhere.
    > You are clogging the group by meaningless postings.


    hmmm. unrepentant top-poster?
    *plonk*

    -Karl
     
    Karl Core, Oct 8, 2004
    #15
  16. aa

    Default User Guest

    aa wrote:

    > Hi, boys.
    > A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply
    > without scrolling down long thread.



    You had a shot, things were explained, you choose not to honor the
    wishes of the group.


    *plonk*




    Brian
     
    Default User, Oct 8, 2004
    #16
  17. aa

    Hywel Guest

    In article <416658b3$0$59479$>, aa
    says...
    > Hi, boys.
    > A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply without
    > scrolling down long thread.
    > I, however, do not try to impose my preferences on you.


    *You* asked for help in a group where bottom posting is the norm.

    > Symmetrically, why should you?


    We helped *you*.

    --
    Hywel

    http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/
     
    Hywel, Oct 8, 2004
    #17
  18. aa

    Hywel Guest

    In article <4165b997$0$59465$>, aa
    says...
    > Hywel,
    > If you have nothing to say to the point, you better indulge yourself into
    > playng a Victorian teacher elsewhere.


    Is is another one of those "Retards in the intermaweb" days again?

    --
    Hywel

    http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/
     
    Hywel, Oct 8, 2004
    #18
  19. aa

    Dylan Parry Guest

    Dylan Parry, Oct 8, 2004
    #19
  20. "aa" <> wrote in message news:<416658b3$0$59479$>...
    > A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply without
    > scrolling down long thread.


    ....which isn't a problem if people bother to *trim* the unnecessary
    parts of the long thread.

    http://mailformat.dan.info/quoting/

    --
    Dan
     
    Daniel R. Tobias, Oct 8, 2004
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Waldy

    Code changes ignored

    Waldy, Jul 29, 2005, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    377
    Waldy
    Jul 29, 2005
  2. Ivor O'Connor
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    924
    Isofarro
    Nov 25, 2003
  3. Peter Mount
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,001
    Peter Mount
    Jan 31, 2006
  4. andrew cooke
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    289
    Vinay Sajip
    Apr 26, 2008
  5. Pugi!
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    260
    Pugi!
    Feb 5, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page