changes in HTML code are ignored by the browser (IE6)

T

Toby Inkster

aa said:
A lot of people prefer top posting as it alows to read the reply without
scrolling down long thread.

How far did you have to scroll to read this?
 
A

aa

I really enjoy talking to you, boys (and girls, as someone sexless rf sugested) - good friday afternoon!
I seem to attract people who have nothing to occupy themselves with and who, seem to very successfully hide any knowledge of the subject which I thought was HTML.
Not to upset that many nervous gurus, I took a Solomon's decision and removed all the previous postings from this reply, so noone can say if it is a top posting or the bottom one :)
But to highlite the quote, of which I use a lot here, I have to commit another crime: use HTML format. Sorry for that.

Some people like Neal, and rf, while complainig about clogging, indulge themselves into an offshoot of the subject "drop down menu" above. From my experience, the most obsessed with the formal rules are people who are not good in ther subject. They try to compensate for that by becoming civil servants.

I really like some remarks:

1. By Toby Inkster:
"You are clogging up the group with poorly formatted postings." - this is especially funny taking into account that Toby have just added the 13th posting to the prevous 12 adding nothing new.

2. By rf:
"Hmmm. Sexist are we? There are a lot of girls doing this as well."

My message "Hi boys" was addressed to Hywell, Neal and Toby Inkster. Tell me, rf, which of these are girls so that in the future I address her correctly? And yourseld, rf, are you a boy ar a girl?

"Many of them would rip your balls off for that opening."
Unlikely. If you have inclination to rip off genitals, with me you'll have to limit your fantasy with tits: I am a girl

3. Another beautiful pattern by rf - this time he/she is answering Kajupa question in the "drop down menu" thread:
What menu?

"I see a bunch of select elements on a black background. I also see a toaster. I don't see any menu.
Wait, I'll shut down IE and start Mozilla.
I see a bunch of select elements on a black background. I also see a white rectangle. I don't see any menu.
Time to rethink your design..."

Kajupa did not top-posted. Nevertheless he/her gets full load of rf's sense of humor. You should take care of your balls, rf, if you have any.


4. By Neal:
"Ok. Good luck with your site."

I like the sarcasm. Neal obviously thinks that without his/her (what sex are you, Neal?) advises how to do posting, my website (and like anybody else in this thread, he/she give no other advises) will collaps instantly.

Thank you for the fun, boys and girls. I hope you will add something for my Monday amusement. Meanwhile have a busy weekend
 
C

C A Upsdell

I really enjoy talking to you, boys (and girls, as someone sexless rf
sugested) - good friday afternoon!
I seem to attract people who have nothing to occupy themselves with and who,
seem to very successfully hide any knowledge of the subject which I thought
was HTML.
Not to upset that many nervous gurus, I took a Solomon's decision and
removed all the previous postings from this reply, so noone can say if it is
a top posting or the bottom one :)
But to highlite the quote, of which I use a lot here, I have to commit
another crime: use HTML format. Sorry for that.
 
T

Toby Inkster

aa said:
By Toby Inkster:


this is especially funny taking into account that Toby have just added
the 13th posting to the prevous 12 adding nothing new.

Your newsreader's threading is obviously broken, mine was actually the
second reply (of a total of four) to that particular post.

And indeed it did add something new -- a link to this page:
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

I thoroughly recommend you read and digest that page if you want to find
your way out of mine and other people's killfiles.
 
L

Leonard Blaisdell

"aa" said:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Why feed the troll?
<div>
<attempt at satire>
<troll>
<p>
Idiots, fools, typewriting monkeys, Usenet clueless fools, everything
you've ever posted is ignorant garbage, did you 'read' what you just
wrote, abysmally ignorant of the correct (my) point of view.
</p>
</troll>
</attempt at satire>
</div>
Error: <attempt at satire> is not a part of the HTML 4.01 specification.
Warning: <troll> should be accompanied by the finger symbol.
Alert: <p> is not required within a <div>.

leo
 
J

Jan Faerber

Dylan said:
As an authority on the subject, aa proclaimed:


What browser are you using?

http://allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post


Yes, it would be really interesting for me to get such a browser!
When I use php then I see in the source code NO php at all.
Something like WYSIWYG.
It would be interesting to use such a thing for javascript - lol
If your browser really supports that
you should use it occasionally to check your code.
That would be a security issue for Bill Gates aswell!:
Hide your javascripts... :)
 
A

aa

Your newsreader's threading is obviously broken, mine was actually the
second reply (of a total of four) to that particular post.

Sorry, Tob, if anything is broken here, it should be on your side.
You seem to forget that you sent more than one meaningful message in here -
will you check the thread again
 
A

aa

You're still an idiot. That will never change.

Thank, you very much!
From you, Hywell, I take it as a compliment.
In an unlikely event you start praising me, I would know I need to submit my
head for inspection.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,768
Messages
2,569,574
Members
45,051
Latest member
CarleyMcCr

Latest Threads

Top