G
Hi guys,
check my accessible version of http://www.gizax.it
Hi guys,
check my accessible version of hxxp://www.gizax.it
check my accessible version of http://www.gizax.it
What so accessible about it? Though not completely bad,
"Karl Core" ha scritto :
| If you think opening new windows on each new link is "accessible", you
have
| a lot to learn.
thank Karl,
but for me is important that XHTML validator do not give errors.
Howewer thx for your opinion.
You present your site as "accessible", yet it is not. You are a liar.
well, he is also Italian. Maybe he is just using the wrong English word.
Something like "viewable" or "visible" might be more like what he (or
she?) meant, rather than accessible, which has a very specific meaning in
English and in a Web context.
Just speculating.
Barbara de Zoete said:well, he is also Italian. Maybe he is just using the wrong English word.
Something like "viewable" or "visible" might be more like what he (or
she?) meant, rather than accessible, which has a very specific meaning in
English and in a Web context.
Dutch doesn't have the word accessible (or any variant of it), but Italian
certainly does. Look at the righthand bottom corner of his blog. It says
'Il tuo sito è accessibile?' which I immagine means something like 'Is
your site accessible?' Why would the Italian word, derived from Latin, be
anything else than the English word, derived from Latin[1]. In this case I
think he thinks too lightly about accessibility. Either that, or he found
a way to spam newsgroups, that is hard to notice as such.
Just speculating.
Me too
[1] I know, this is not a very scientific argument.
Mine is not a spam.
If you don't accept my website no problems.
I posted my website to check, I accept all kinds of opinions.
If you don't believe this, excuse me but isn't my problem.
Ah, no? It certainly triggered you back to life!
of your site. People here, including me, see no accessible site.It is not about accepting. You asked for a check of an accessible version
you get as just opinions (meaning: I don't bother to do anything with whatI don't understand. What do you want checked if you regard the critique
sig's of posts in your reply's and you shouldn't. The sig separator is toNo? But you have another problem. Fix your newsreader. You include the
"Karl Core" ha scritto :
| If you think opening new windows on each new link is "accessible", you
but for me is important that XHTML validator do not give errors.
be removed without making the page invalid.Not a problem, anything that causes a link to be opened in a new window can
The only link I see is the small image which leads to presumably his home page._on your pages_
- the concept of a splash screen at the so called front af a site sucks
and is not user friendly at all (all I get to see[1] are two links; one
leading to the page I was after presumably and another one for a ticker of
some sort)
He has a list of allegedly 'accessible' sites on his (presumed) home page.[1] Either in Lynx or in any browser without graphics (no images and what
ever more)
"Barbara de Zoete" ha scritto
<snip: arguments as to understanding of the English word accessibility by
OP who is Italian>
Yes and for this I accept oll critiques
But you are always so nervous with all ??
Sorry for this, is my first time that I write in newsgroup and I write
with Outlook Express.
Okay, that's good.
Hey, hey. I can do without people projecting all sorts of states on me
unless they are educated and trained psychologists or psychiatrists
and I am their patient.
I saw in another post that you intend to use a real newsreader. That's
good.
In message <opsh8j56e7x5vgts@zoete_b>
The only link I see is the small image which leads to presumably hisBarbara de Zoete said:_on your pages_
- the concept of a splash screen at the so called front af a site
sucks and is not user friendly at all (all I get to see[1] are
two links; one leading to the page I was after presumably and
another one for a ticker of some sort)
home page.
I don't see the other one at all...
He has a list of allegedly 'accessible' sites on his (presumed) home[1] Either in Lynx or in any browser without graphics (no images and
what ever more)
page.
I followed one of the links and got onto a link-page 'Best of British';
followed one of the links at random and arrived at a site
www.estherfranklin.co.uk whose homepage is just a very big
sliced-and-diced graphic, with no sensible alt-text, and a link which
says "Enter Site" "Get Flash Plug-in."
Predictably, if you click "Enter Site" without Flash, you just get a big
rectangle with 'no plug-in' as the alt.
Accessible?
Not unless they've changed the meaning since I last looked.
Slainte
It's (Scots) Gaelic.I don't know this word. I couldn't find it in any of my dictionairies
either (All English or English->Dutch). What does it mean.
In message <opsh8umgrnx5vgts@zoete_b>
It's (Scots) Gaelic.
(It might also be Irish Gaelic, for all I know.)
It means Health, and is the usual abbreviation for Slainte mhath, meaning
'good health', a traditional Scottish toast, even for us 'lallans'
speakers
('lowlands') who know little other Gaelic.
Interpret as: 'best wishes from Scotland'.
It's pronounced something like Slahnge vah (very soft g)
Slainte
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.