Check this puppy out now

R

Richard

Hywel said:
http://www.geocities.com/r_bullis/index.htm


I found out the damn thing works just fine [so far] without the ilayer
and layer crap. Works in IE and firefox just fine. EAT YOUR HEART OUT!
21 errors. You really are a fsckwit.

Yep. All of them generated by the geocities banner generation crap.


1.)
Line 217, column 69: end tag for element "OBJECT" which is not open

.... by server. PLEASE
REMOVE --></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript

Source:
/BODY>
</HTML><!-- text below generated by server. PLEASE
REMOVE --></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript></table></script>
</applet>
<link href="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.css" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css"><script language="JavaScript"
src="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.js"></script><script
language="JavaScript"
src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mc/mc.js"></script><script
language="JavaScript"
src="http://geocities.com/js_source/geov2.js"></script><script
language="javascript">geovisit();</script><noscript><img
src="http://visit.webhosting.yahoo.com/visit.gif?us1104701531"
alt="setstats" border="0" width="1" height="1"></noscript>
<IMG SRC="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=76001075&t=1104701531" ALT=1 WIDTH=1
HEIGHT=1>


Notice all them links? Not my doing.

Which is why you do not attempt to validate a page hosted by geocities.
It never will.

All 21 errors stem from line 217 or 218 which I did not create.
 
C

C.W.

Hywel said:
http://www.geocities.com/r_bullis/index.htm


I found out the damn thing works just fine [so far] without the ilayer
and layer crap. Works in IE and firefox just fine. EAT YOUR HEART OUT!
21 errors. You really are a fsckwit.

Yep. All of them generated by the geocities banner generation crap.
[snip]

Which is why you do not attempt to validate a page hosted by geocities.
It never will.

Granted it will *never* validate - the errors in the Ad Square are not
an argument for not validating a page hosted on free level GeoCities
[or another host that may insert ads or frames] but actually more of a
reason to validate your content.

This way, by validating, the only errors on your page is those by
Yahoo - not by you _and_ Yahoo combined.

Only 21 errors on Geo's side now? Hm, Yahoo must be gradually working
on it - I sent them an email 2 weeks ago about W3C sharing there were
25 errors from their side of the coin thanks to their Ad Square
script.

Carol
 
C

C.W.

I don't think you deserve that W3C valid logo.

He put the logo on the page even though he knows there are errors on
it [thanks to yahoo's side]? [Which may blow the whistle that I don't
even bother looking at the site in question at all ...]

Granted the offline copy may be 100% valid, the online copy - thanks
to Yahoo - is _not_ [and likely never will be] valid. All people will
see, that clicks on the Valid link or goes to check for themselves, is
the message "This page is not valid HTML v4.1 .,,," Kinda silly to
even bother putting the link or icon on a free-level GeoCities site at
all.

Carol
 
O

Oli Filth

Richard said:
Hywel Jenkins wrote:

http://www.geocities.com/r_bullis/index.htm


I found out the damn thing works just fine [so far] without the ilayer
and layer crap. Works in IE and firefox just fine. EAT YOUR HEART OUT!

21 errors. You really are a fsckwit.


Yep. All of them generated by the geocities banner generation crap.


1.)
Line 217, column 69: end tag for element "OBJECT" which is not open

... by server. PLEASE
REMOVE --></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript

Source:
/BODY>
</HTML><!-- text below generated by server. PLEASE
REMOVE --></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript></table></script>
</applet>
<link href="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.css" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css"><script language="JavaScript"
src="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.js"></script><script
language="JavaScript"
src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mc/mc.js"></script><script
language="JavaScript"
src="http://geocities.com/js_source/geov2.js"></script><script
language="javascript">geovisit();</script><noscript><img
src="http://visit.webhosting.yahoo.com/visit.gif?us1104701531"
alt="setstats" border="0" width="1" height="1"></noscript>
<IMG SRC="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=76001075&t=1104701531" ALT=1 WIDTH=1
HEIGHT=1>


Notice all them links? Not my doing.

Which is why you do not attempt to validate a page hosted by geocities.
It never will.

All 21 errors stem from line 217 or 218 which I did not create.

Anyway, well done...
But hang on, some of that code is from www.dynamicdrive.com...
Actually, most of it is...

So out of that whole page, this is the code that you actually wrote
yourself which you're so proud of:


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>[No title]</TITLE>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset='iso-8859-1'">
<style type="text/css">
..main { width:1000px; height:900px; }
..navbar { width:200px; height:900px; background-color:#7F7; float:left;}
..middle { width:200px; height:900px; background-color:#F44; float:left;}
..iright { width:400px; height:900px; background-color:#44F; float:left;}
</style>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<div class="main">
<Div class="navbar">
</div>
</div>
<div class="iright">
</div>
</BODY>
</HTML>


Bonza.

Oli
 
S

Steve Pugh

Oli Filth said:
But hang on, some of that code is from www.dynamicdrive.com...
Actually, most of it is...

So out of that whole page, this is the code that you actually wrote
yourself which you're so proud of:

[snip short piece of code]

Ah, but in this case mastering cut and paste is an achievement...

Steve
 
T

Travis Newbury

C.W. said:
I don't think you deserve that W3C valid logo...
...Granted the offline copy may be 100% valid, the online copy - thanks
to Yahoo - is _not_ [and likely never will be] valid. All people will
see, that clicks on the Valid link or goes to check for themselves, is
the message "This page is not valid HTML v4.1 ...."

Click on ANY icon like that and you will probably see that the code is
not valid. Every time I see one of those I check, and at least 50% of
the time the site is no longer valid. (I am commenting on the general
use of the graphic rather than this particular case)
 
A

Alex McKean

You are the type of person that gives newsgroups, etc. a bad rep. It would
be so nice if we could filter this crap out from our younger population. Oh
well, the world will always have it's trash.
Hywel Jenkins said:
Hywel Jenkins said:
http://www.geocities.com/r_bullis/index.htm


I found out the damn thing works just fine [so far] without the ilayer
and
layer crap.
Works in IE and firefox just fine.

EAT YOUR HEART OUT!

21 errors. You really are a fsckwit.
What is a "fsckwit"???

Pick a letter, say the one between "T" and "V" and replace the "s".
 
R

Richard

Oli said:
Richard said:
Hywel Jenkins wrote:

http://www.geocities.com/r_bullis/index.htm


I found out the damn thing works just fine [so far] without the ilayer
and layer crap. Works in IE and firefox just fine. EAT YOUR HEART OUT!

21 errors. You really are a fsckwit.


Yep. All of them generated by the geocities banner generation crap.


1.)
Line 217, column 69: end tag for element "OBJECT" which is not open

... by server. PLEASE
REMOVE --></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript

Source:
/BODY>
</HTML><!-- text below generated by server. PLEASE
REMOVE
--></object></layer></div></span></style></noscript></table></script> </a
pplet> <link href="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.css"
rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"><script
language="JavaScript" src="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/div.js"></sc
ript><script language="JavaScript" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com
/i/mc/mc.js"></script><script language="JavaScript" src="http://geocities
.com/js_source/geov2.js"></script><script language="javascript">geovisit(
);</script><noscript><img src="http://visit.webhosting.yahoo.com/visit.gi
f?us1104701531" alt="setstats" border="0" width="1"
height="1"></noscript> <IMG
SRC="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=76001075&t=1104701531" ALT=1
WIDTH=1 HEIGHT=1> Notice all them links? Not my doing. Which is why you
do not attempt to validate a page hosted by geocities. It never will. All
21 errors stem from line 217 or 218 which I did not create.
Anyway, well done...
But hang on, some of that code is from www.dynamicdrive.com...
Actually, most of it is...
So out of that whole page, this is the code that you actually wrote
yourself which you're so proud of:


I never said I wrote the code.
I do believe somewhere along the way I had said the code was available at
dynamicdrive.
What I have done, is combined the two to help make my idea work out.

My next step, is to see if I can manipulate the code so that when an item in
column 2 is clicked on, which was generated by actions in column 1, to be
passed over to column 3.

Such as thumbnails being presented in column 2, and when clicked on or
mousedover, information about the image is shown.
 
R

Richard

Alex said:
You are the type of person that gives newsgroups, etc. a bad rep. It would
be so nice if we could filter this crap out from our younger population.
Oh well, the world will always have it's trash.

Fsckwit is an attempt to thwart filters and an idiots guide to stupidity.
As in those that would rather use "pr0n" instead of porn.
Even though they are morally high and mighty, they try to keep their
morality in place by using such symbolic language because they can't
possibly use the real words themselves.

A fuckwit is a person who is totally ignorant and stupid.
When you can't find something more suitable to use, you use fuckwit.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fuckwit&defid=700885
 
R

Richard

Travis said:
C.W. said:
I don't think you deserve that W3C valid logo...
...Granted the offline copy may be 100% valid, the online copy - thanks
to Yahoo - is _not_ [and likely never will be] valid. All people will
see, that clicks on the Valid link or goes to check for themselves, is
the message "This page is not valid HTML v4.1 ...."
Click on ANY icon like that and you will probably see that the code is
not valid. Every time I see one of those I check, and at least 50% of
the time the site is no longer valid. (I am commenting on the general
use of the graphic rather than this particular case)


I have no intention on keeping the logo up.
I just put it there for you guys as a shortcut.
I feel either the page is valid or it isn't. No need to advertise it.

My brother used to feel that it wasn't something good until I explained to
hiim what it meant.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,763
Messages
2,569,563
Members
45,039
Latest member
CasimiraVa

Latest Threads

Top