I think it says a hell of a lot about comp sci that when EBDI don't
know was extended to ascii, they included the ever useful char 190: ? and
not lambda, therewith thumbing their noses at the 20th century's greatest
physicist and logician simultaneously.
What it says is that the development of ASCII was driven by commercial
computing concerns, and not computer science. ASCII (which is not
an "extension" of EBCDIC, if that's what you were referring to) is
a 7-bit code. It had to include upper- and lowercase English letters,
decimal digits, basic punctuation marks, and control codes; with only
128 code points, that doesn't leave a lot of room. You're welcome to
look at some of the documents on the history of ASCII (there are many
available on the net) and second-guess the committees that developed
it, but I don't think you'll get much agreement among computer
programmers, or computer scientists, or even physicists and logicians
that the omission of lambda was either regretable or an insult to
Alonzo Church.
That said, this is off-topic for comp.lang.c. It would be on-topic
for, say, alt.folklore.computers, where such speculations are
welcome.
--
Michael Wojcik (e-mail address removed)
Unfortunately, as a software professional, tradition requires me to spend New
Years Eve drinking alone, playing video games and sobbing uncontrollably.
-- Peter Johnson