(e-mail address removed) wrote in
You want to eliminate spam by sending a lot more spam?
Do you also hope to eliminate disease by infecting a lot of people
with diseases? Or maybe we could eliminate violence by simply shooting
everybody?
That would stop it.
Lots of it for sure. Nobody left to kill, or spam, or disease. Nice
scenario.---
meanwhile in the real world, law enforcement and laws do not exist for
this kind of activity to make it stop completely. Spammers are still
making $$$ or nobody would see the volumes of spam that are continuing to
be sent.
It's good to know that Pfizer has been part of the problem, in their own
inept way, so now they cant ignore it as they have in the past.
The total solution to the spam problem appears to hinge on fragmentary
solutions to parts of the same problem. We want to stop the spammers
from spamming, but to do so requires laws and law enforcement which backs
up the law with real force. Then there's the civil side which sues for
tortuous interference of the right of individuals to have their own
mailbox filled with the stuff they asked for and not the intruder's crap
flow.
At this point a good nuke works through all the red tape without the
details and it guarantees the spam will stop.
And yes, this is a runaway theory tried and found deficient. The email
system is rendered useless by both factions ddossing each other out of
the use of email as we know it.
Back to technology and law enforcement. There's a decidedly lack of
cooperation on aprehending and jailing these perps. There are some cases
where spammers have been imprisoned- but far to few of the real total who
are doing it. ramp up the prosecutions, investigations, and quit the
whining - just do it.
--
SneakyP
What's posted in ng stays in ng.
Pambo admits her scorn for MJ victims:
"f'ck the real victims, they don't matter"
<
[email protected]>
