Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said the following on 12/8/2005 11:32 PM:
VA wrote:
Because maybe you did not use the final version of Firefox 1.5 (as of
November 30, 2005) but a previous release candidate; I see that this does
not apply here, Gecko/20051111 indicates 1.5 RC3 which is identical to the
final release (the difference is just a renamed installer).
Possible.
Because the used operating system and version (here: Windows Server 2003)
may be important.
Nonsense.
Because the built-in language package used (here: en-US) may be important.
Nonsense.
Because extensions can modify Firefox in a way that behaviour occurs
that is not reproducible without them.
Possible.
Then you probably cannot be helped.
Now you are being the typical Thomas.
Seeing the real code will allow to exclude any side-effects like invalid
markup or unsupported media types that may affect Firefox's behavior.
And if it can be made to work in any other environment, then it points
to the environment. That has nothing to do with invalid markup or
unsupported media types.
It is real code. It just isn't server based code is all.
You are unwilling to help people help you, and you are unwilling to try.
What do you expect?
For someone to actually try to help solve his problems instead of going
on with ramblings about irrelevant things like OS, Extensions, etc....
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ -
http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly
Javascript Best Practices -
http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
Answer:It destroys the order of the conversation
Question: Why?
Answer: Top-Posting.
Question: Whats the most annoying thing on Usenet?
Please quote what you are replying to.
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.