I
Ian Collins
A number of old school Usenet users ignore posts from groups.google.com.
A number of old school Usenet users ignore posts from groups.google.com.
J
Joe Pfeiffer
Todd Carnes said:
checking... in this case, the original question was, as was the OPs
followup pointing to the #define in the kernel.
P
Phil Carmody
Todd Carnes said:
I'm not quite sure how a post from googlegroups can be anything but a
googlegroups post, but if in your twisted little world that's how
things are, I hope you're happy there.
Phil
T
Todd Carnes
I see. I think it's a silly thing to do, but I guess it's no different
than the way I refused for years to give in and get a cell phone. Sooner
or later they'll get over it...just like I did.
Todd
T
Todd Carnes
Sheesh, don't get your panties in a bunch.
While users on GoogleGroups may post to a usenet newsgroup, they also may
post to groups that are not on usenet... i.e. a GoogleGroup. I'm only
saying that comp.lang.c is not a GoogleGroup. It's a usenet group.
Todd
K
Keith Thompson
Todd Carnes said:
I presume that by "googlegroups posts" he means articles posted to
Usenet via the Google groups interface.
P
Phil Carmody
Todd Carnes said:
Care to cite where I said otherwise?
For a while I used to have aioe.org /en bloc/ in my killfile too due
to the low SNR therefrom, you have reminded me of those days.
Phil
T
Todd Carnes
Yeah, I get it now. I took it the wrong way at first.
Todd
S
Seebs
Well, maybe. If people with cell phones called you, did it result in
conversations with them being broken up into 1-minute sub-conversations
scattered around apparently randomly?
.... Come to think of it, maybe that is a sort of good analogy.
-s
T
Todd Carnes
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:52:21 +0300, Phil Carmody wrote:
[blah, blah, blah... snip]
Whatever.
Believe it or not, I really was sorry you took offense (at first), but if
you want to get all worked up over one little comment, go right ahead.
As for me, I consider the conversation (what little there was of it) to
be over.
Todd
[blah, blah, blah... snip]
Whatever.
Believe it or not, I really was sorry you took offense (at first), but if
you want to get all worked up over one little comment, go right ahead.
As for me, I consider the conversation (what little there was of it) to
be over.
Todd
T
Todd Carnes
LOL... Yes, in the beginning, it often did.
Todd
W
Willem
Todd Carnes wrote:
) On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:38 +0000, Seebs wrote:
)> Well, maybe. If people with cell phones called you, did it result in
)> conversations with them being broken up into 1-minute sub-conversations
)> scattered around apparently randomly?
)>
)> ... Come to think of it, maybe that is a sort of good analogy.
)>
)> -s
)
) LOL... Yes, in the beginning, it often did.
ObRandomQuote:
Call-phone sex: Can you feel me now ? And now ? How 'bout now ?
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
) On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:12:38 +0000, Seebs wrote:
)> Well, maybe. If people with cell phones called you, did it result in
)> conversations with them being broken up into 1-minute sub-conversations
)> scattered around apparently randomly?
)>
)> ... Come to think of it, maybe that is a sort of good analogy.
)>
)> -s
)
) LOL... Yes, in the beginning, it often did.
ObRandomQuote:
Call-phone sex: Can you feel me now ? And now ? How 'bout now ?
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
R
Robert Miles
I see. I think it's a silly thing to do, but I guess it's no different
than the way I refused for years to give in and get a cell phone. Sooner
or later they'll get over it...just like I did.
Todd
Depends on how good you are at ignoring or filtering out the
heavy flow of spam from groups.google.com.