Joe said:
(I have never understood why that is a big deal - it makes life so much
faster if you don't have to scroll, especially for a short post like this.
Normally, for short replies you need only a short context either. Thus,
there is not much scrolling needed anyway. The only reason to quote
something is to setup a context. Thus, why quote if you don't want people
to read it *before* reading your statements on the issue. There is a
signature around which actually brings it to the point quite well but I
don't have the exact wording. It goes something like this:
A: it makes reading things harder
Q: why is top posting bad?
If anyone has a good reason for why people don't like it, can they tell me?
I will sleep better if I know)
Well, if you top posted, you might actually sleep worse: excessive quoting
is a copyright infringement! Every article is covered by an implicit
copyright which protects the author's rights. Readers are allowed to read
things, make reasonable quotes (this is always allowed and cannot really
be prohibited as far as I know), and that's about it. Quoting texts entirely
or adding only minor own stuff to an article is generally prohibited. As is,
BTW, using any code posted in articles! Of course, more liberal copyrights
can be given at the author's discretion. I think the implicit copyright, ie.
the one given if the author does not state anything explicitly, is basically
as restrictive as a copyright can become. Note, that the copyright
legislation is international law. Also note that I'm not a lawyer: this is
what I understood from reading some stuff on copyright issues. However, I'm
pretty sure that at least the gist is right even if some details are wrong.
The issue of top-posting came up in a discussion amoung the moderators of
comp.lang.c++.moderated these days, too, although embedded into the bigger
context of overquotes. Our current policy is effectively to reject articles
on the basis of overquotes if the ratio between new material and quotes is
too bad and there seems to be no reason for that much quoting. The ratio is
an objective measure while the evaluation of whether the quoting is really
necessary is subjective, of course. Most rejections due to overquoting are
due to articles using top posting although we don't reject top posts per
se. I think there is a consensus amoung the moderators to continue rejecting
articles due to overquoting.