Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening

[manu]

Hi,

Can anyone please tell me the difference of opening file in Binary
mode or in Text mode?

 

[Barry Schwarz]

Hi,

Can anyone please tell me the difference of opening file in Binary
mode or in Text mode?

Are you perhaps taking the same class as subramanian100in? In either
case, you can check the thread he (or she) started 8 hours earlier
with the subject "text and binary streams".

 

[Falcon Kirtaran]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In any modern operating system I can think of, the distinction is
completely archaic.

Hi,

Can anyone please tell me the difference of opening file in Binary
mode or in Text mode?

- --
- --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran
- --
- --OpenPGP: (7902:4457) 9282:A431

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=ricw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Keith Thompson]

In any modern operating system I can think of, the distinction is
completely archaic.

Top-posting corrected. See:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/topposting.php

Perhaps your definition of "modern" excludes MS Windows, but there
definitely are systems where it makes a big difference.

And wny are you responding to an article that was posted last August?

 

[Falcon Kirtaran]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Top-posting corrected. See:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/topposting.php

Perhaps your definition of "modern" excludes MS Windows, but there
definitely are systems where it makes a big difference.

And wny are you responding to an article that was posted last August?

Hmm, it seems innd was broken, after a fashion.

- --
- --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran
- --
- --OpenPGP: (7902:4457) 9282:A431

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=TKtn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[CBFalconer]

.... snip ...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJJXt1EAAoJEKmxP9YxEE4rUUMQAL2P/pKoME4eMCy60AgSyyNy

.... snip ...

Please remove this. It is purposeless on Usenet, and an annoyance.

 

[Richard]

... snip ...

Please remove this. It is purposeless on Usenet, and an annoyance.

Just to remind you, you self important arse, you were posting with a
double sig for a long long time despite many of us asking you very
nicely to remove it and pointing you to a free news service.

 

[Default User]

CBFalconer said:


It's his sig block. Yes, it's over-long. Is that your complaint
about it? If so, the complaint is hypocritical. If not, what,
precisely, are you complaining about?

I didn't see the original message, but what's quoted doesn't have the
standard signature separator.




Brian

 

[Richard]

I didn't see the original message, but what's quoted doesn't have the
standard signature separator.




Brian

Try learning how to use a news reader then and find the OP.

It was NOT his sig block. It was the PGP signature which rattled net
busy body and general hypocrite CBF.

FWIW, I think signing posts to usenet is pretentious and silly too, but
for Falconer, of all people, to complain keeping in mind his posting
history is simply beyond belief.

 

[Default User]

Try learning how to use a news reader then and find the OP.

I suspect that I didn't see if because I have the person killfiled.

It was NOT his sig block. It was the PGP signature which rattled net
busy body and general hypocrite CBF.

So you disagree with Mr. Heathfield.




Brian

 

[Richard]

I suspect that I didn't see if because I have the person killfiled.

The learn how to use a news reader and fetch the article anyway if you
are going to venture an incorrect comment on it. its called "fetch
parent" or similar.

So you disagree with Mr. Heathfield.

Who is "Mr Heathfield"? You mean Richard Heathfield? Why are you
mentioning him? Why should you care if I agree or disagree with him?

I am telling you what it was, not who I agree with or disagree with.

It was his pgp signing attachment.

So yes, Heathfield was wrong too if that's all you are worried about. He
was not wrong about CBF being a hypocritical busybody however.

 

[Default User]

Who is "Mr Heathfield"?

What the hell am I doing? Riley goes and changes his email and I don't
even notice. Sorry gang.

*replonk*





Brian