DNS with bind9 sucks, what is an easier tool for full DNS?

Discussion in 'Perl Misc' started by gavino, Jul 26, 2006.

  1. gavino

    gavino Guest

    anyone?
    gavino, Jul 26, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. gavino

    Sqrex Guest

    In my opinion djbdns i very good replacment. It has modular
    construction so i.e. u don`t need to run full dns to have only caching
    function and it`s more secure.

    gavino napisal(a):
    > anyone?
    Sqrex, Jul 26, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. gavino

    Ted Zlatanov Guest

    On 26 Jul 2006, wrote:

    > In my opinion djbdns i very good replacment. It has modular
    > construction so i.e. u don`t need to run full dns to have only caching
    > function and it`s more secure.
    >
    > gavino napisal(a):
    >> anyone?


    What does it have to do with Perl, though?

    Ted
    Ted Zlatanov, Jul 27, 2006
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Steven Zhang

    A bug or perl sucks

    Steven Zhang, Sep 20, 2004, in forum: Perl
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    523
  2. Replies:
    96
    Views:
    2,258
    Monique Y. Mudama
    Feb 7, 2006
  3. Nomen Nescio
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    759
    brucie
    May 26, 2004
  4. dm1608
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    299
    dm1608
    Sep 9, 2008
  5. Sam Roberts
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    192
    Sam Roberts
    Mar 20, 2005
Loading...

Share This Page