L
Linuxmank
Done
Now who will be the first to link the topics of "sex" and "video tutorial" in
a way that many here might find enlightening?
Actually, a guy at a recent Rails conference did something much along
those lines. It didn't go down well in all quarters.
tom
Linuxmank said:Please comment on the blog. I will appreciate that
OK, I looked at your blog. The good news is that it's not plagiarized. The
bad news is that it reads like it was written by a not-very-precocious
eight-year-old. The impenetrable writing might be excusable if there were any
useful content in the blog, but there isn't, really. The site asks me to
enable no fewer than twelve script sources, nearly all of them counters and
other adware-style sources.
I am so glad I use NoScript.
Oh, and the page design is weak.
If you want to write a useful blog, clean up the grammar and spelling, put
some useful content in there, and get rid of the ad-bloat and abundance of
toxic scripting. Right now the blog is garbage.
Tom said:Actually, a guy at a recent Rails conference did something much along
those lines. It didn't go down well in all quarters.
Andrew said:OTOH to all this, I suspect video tutorials will
become more popular (than they are now) over time.
The 'younger people' have a less finely attuned sense
of appreciating just how many bytes are involved in
downloading a video.
The popularity of streamed video
& music, as well as the mostly wasted bandwidth of
YouTube (wasted in the sense the content is not saved,
just viewed & discarded)
supports that most web surfers
these days would not think twice about downloading N
Meg of video, just to learn how to hard-boil an egg.
There might also be a slight 'younger people prefer
moving pictures' aspect to it, but I cannot see that
applying too much to people who are actually capable
of programming (as opposed to the myriads that might
try).
Dear Member,
I am just curious to know, do programmers like video tutorial or
written tutorial in general ?
Any feedback from programmers are much appreciated.
Many Thanks
bugbear said:You copied this thread to your blog without attribution to USENET.
Do you think that's honest?
Linuxmank said:Done
Linuxmank said:Please comment on the blog. I will appreciate that
Linuxmank said:My blog have more than 100 happy subscribers and for them my blog is
good information provider.
So I will NEVER ever going to change the
layout and my blogging style.
But I wish all the happiness you should have from your little website
which you been moaning about in my two post.
...
Ah Lew, Lew, Lew
I reckon you are a permanent resident google groups.
And thanks for your abusive language on my other post on java gui
grouphttp://groups.google.co.in/group/comp.lang.java.gui/browse_thread/thr...
My blog have more than 100 happy subscribers ..
...good information provider. So I will NEVER ever going to change the
layout and my blogging style.
But I wish all the happiness you should have from your little website
which you been moaning about in my two post.
Andrew said:What web site? Lew has a *web site*? I would be
very interested to know the URL.
Written by far. The reason is searching. I can use google or other
tools to find what I want. Video tutorials have no indexing. Usually
I don't want the whole tutorial, or I am trying to find a tutorial on
some specific point.
No. It is just 'Lew'.
What? My browser shows that post as having not a
single reply. About what it deserved.
Well dude, with 'over 100 subscribers' why are
you worrying about what /anybody/ else thinks?
Look out YouTube!
(BTW - idiots are often happy.)
Like I said - don't change a thing. Ever.
What web site? Lew has a *web site*? I would be
very interested to know the URL.
No, I'm not interested in the URL of your blog,
Lew's assessment put the last nails in the coffin
for a site (I was not inclined to visit, based on
anything you had said) by someone that seriously
suggests 'video tutorials'.
So much for him appreciating the comments. He could have used them to
improve his site, but apparently his statement that he would
appreciate comments was not fully accurate.
If "Linuxmank" wants to spam a newsgroup of professional programmers
for his blogscam site purporting to serve professional programmers,
then it should have a professional presentation, which "Linuxmank"
does not provide.
he will become better at receiving constructive criticism instead of
reacting with knee-jerk defensiveness, unfounded and unsubstantiable
claims of mythical "abusive language" and ludicrous ad hominem
attacks.
That he chose those unprofessional responses indicates the measure of
commitment he has, and to what.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.