R
Richard Heathfield
Default User said:
Unlike you, I am not yet convinced that Rod Pemberton is a troll. As I said
back in May:
'It is possible that "troll" is the wrong word for Mr Pemberton, but our
experience of him here in clc has not been a pleasant one. He has certainly
not endeared himself to the group. Many of the people you would probably
consider to be "good posters" have killfiled him. Even amongst those who
have not, I don't know of any who would be particularly keen to sing his
praises. If you want to understand why people here have a certain antipathy
to Mr Pemberton, you could do worse than to research his posting history in
this newsgroup. In my estimation, such research would explain to you why
people are labeling him "troll" (whether or not that label is, strictly
speaking, accurate - which in my view it probably is not).'
I've seen little or nothing since then to make me more, or less, convinced
that Rod Pemberton is trolling the group.
Richard said:Rod Pemberton said:
[who cares]
You are easily amused.
Why feed the troll?
Unlike you, I am not yet convinced that Rod Pemberton is a troll. As I said
back in May:
'It is possible that "troll" is the wrong word for Mr Pemberton, but our
experience of him here in clc has not been a pleasant one. He has certainly
not endeared himself to the group. Many of the people you would probably
consider to be "good posters" have killfiled him. Even amongst those who
have not, I don't know of any who would be particularly keen to sing his
praises. If you want to understand why people here have a certain antipathy
to Mr Pemberton, you could do worse than to research his posting history in
this newsgroup. In my estimation, such research would explain to you why
people are labeling him "troll" (whether or not that label is, strictly
speaking, accurate - which in my view it probably is not).'
I've seen little or nothing since then to make me more, or less, convinced
that Rod Pemberton is trolling the group.