FAQ Topic - I have a question that is not answered in here or in any of the resources mentioned here

[FAQ server]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAQ Topic - I have a question that is not answered in here or in any of the resources mentioned here but I'm sure it has been answered in clj. Where are the clj archives located?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/

Maintain an archive of
comp.lang.javascript going back to 1996 and provide diverse
archive searching facilities.


===
Postings such as this are automatically sent once a day. Their
goal is to answer repeated questions, and to offer the content to
the community for continuous evaluation/improvement. The complete
comp.lang.javascript FAQ is at http://www.jibbering.com/faq/.
The FAQ workers are a group of volunteers.

 

[Evertjan.]

FAQ server wrote on 02 feb 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:

Formatted like this, with a maximum line length, please.

 

[Randy Webb]

Evertjan. said the following on 2/2/2007 2:01 AM:

FAQ server wrote on 02 feb 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:


Formatted like this, with a maximum line length, please.

Not sure why Bart's server script does that. The answer to a question
uses the text formatting in the XML file and the formatting for the
question is pretty close to the way you have it formatted. So, something
in Bart's side is removing the line feed and putting it all on one line.

Bart?

 

[Bart Van der Donck]

Evertjan. said the following on 2/2/2007 2:01 AM:



Not sure why Bart's server script does that. The answer to a question
uses the text formatting in the XML file and the formatting for the
question is pretty close to the way you have it formatted. So, something
in Bart's side is removing the line feed and putting it all on one line.

Bart?

Yes, the line breaks were removed because the subject in the message-
header can't have EOL characters, or it is considered a new header.

I've adapted the script so that it should now show the correct line
breaks in the message body.

 

[Evertjan.]

Bart Van der Donck wrote on 08 feb 2007 in comp.lang.javascript:

Yes, the line breaks were removed because the subject in the message-
header can't have EOL characters, or it is considered a new header.

I've adapted the script so that it should now show the correct line
breaks in the message body.

Good job.

 

[Dr J R Stockton]

In comp.lang.javascript message <[email protected]
oglegroups.com>, Thu, 8 Feb 2007 04:28:32, Bart Van der Donck

I've adapted the script so that it should now show the correct line
breaks in the message body.

I hope that will nor prevent the Subject being reduced to something
sensible. Its present first sentence is not needed - all it does is
nominally discourage those who want to find the archives for other
reasons.

 

[Randy Webb]

Dr J R Stockton said the following on 2/9/2007 12:48 PM:

In comp.lang.javascript message <[email protected]
oglegroups.com>, Thu, 8 Feb 2007 04:28:32, Bart Van der Donck


I hope that will nor prevent the Subject being reduced to something
sensible.

Unless Bart has changed something in the last 24 hours or so (which I
doubt) then the only way to change the Subject is for me to change the
question in the FAQ XML file itself as it is read directly from there
and is not modified by Bart's script.

BTW, YGCIB.

Its present first sentence is not needed - all it does is
nominally discourage those who want to find the archives for other
reasons.

Nothing in that sentence makes any sense.

 

[Dr J R Stockton]

Dr J R Stockton said the following on 2/9/2007 12:48 PM:

Unless Bart has changed something in the last 24 hours or so (which I
doubt) then the only way to change the Subject is for me to change the
question in the FAQ XML file itself as it is read directly from there
and is not modified by Bart's script.

Of course. It was expected that you would understand that, even with
the nor/not typo.

Nothing in that sentence makes any sense.

To you, quite probably.