Feedback desired on reworked ch 1 progr. intro (now Python 3.x, Windows)

Discussion in 'Python' started by Alf P. Steinbach, Oct 31, 2009.

  1. Hi all!

    After my earlier feedback request a lot of you responded with constructive
    criticism and suggestions.

    As a result of that I've changed the text to be based on *Python 3.x* instead of
    2.6+, and chapter 1 "Getting started" has grown from 9 pages to a whopping 11 pages!

    I would particularly like to thank the following persons (although of course I
    don't know whether any of them would recommend the old text, or the new text!
    :) ), because they directly caused changes of the text:

    Chris Rebert, in [comp.lang.python]
    Ch 1
    "all batteries included" -> "batteries included"
    "OS/X" -> "Mac OS X" (with a space, not a slash)
    "implementation" -> "distribution"

    Eric Brunel, in [comp.lang.python]
    Ch 1
    static type checking discussion yielding wrong impression

    , in [comp.lang.python]
    Ch 1
    Unclear that Windows subsystems are not something to do with Python.

    Ethan Furman, in private communication
    Ch 1
    Pointed out the renaming 2.6 "Tkinter" -> 3.x "tkinter"

    Jon Clements, in [comp.lang.python]
    General
    Info about Python 3.x that let me switch to 3.x

    Plus, the person who suggested that I should mention the PSPad editor, but I
    forgot to note who that was (sorry).

    I hope this new version of ch 1 is, well, better, addresses some of the concerns
    raised? <g>

    <url: http://preview.tinyurl.com/ProgrammingBookP3>
    Formats: PDF, text

    Now starting on ch 2, which with Python 3.x should become a lot cleaner...


    Cheers,

    - Alf
     
    Alf P. Steinbach, Oct 31, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Re: Feedback desired on reworked ch 1 progr. intro (now Python 3.x,Windows)

    * Rhodri James:
    > Before we start, can I just say that I find Google Docs loathsome?
    >
    > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:40:36 -0000, Alf P. Steinbach <>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> I hope this new version of ch 1 is, well, better, addresses some of
    >> the concerns raised? <g>

    >
    > Section 1.1 needs serious work.


    Could you please expand on that?

    It is a hint.

    Byt it doesn't leave me with much to go on regarding what you mean.


    > You have a very assertive writing style
    > and a lot of things that you definitively state are at best debatable.
    > If I'd picked that up in a shop and browsed that opening, I'd put the
    > book down and walk away; essentially you're calling your accuracy into
    > question before you've even said anything about programming.


    Could you please expand on this also? Sort of, more concrete?


    Cheers & thanks,

    - Alf
     
    Alf P. Steinbach, Nov 1, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Alf P. Steinbach
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    676
    Alf P. Steinbach
    Feb 1, 2005
  2. Mark
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    728
    Michele Simionato
    Jun 30, 2004
  3. Mark
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    322
  4. Alf P. Steinbach
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    340
  5. Alf P. Steinbach
    Replies:
    22
    Views:
    717
    Alf P. Steinbach
    Dec 20, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page