find minimum associated values

A

Alan Isaac

I have a small set of objects associated with a larger
set of values, and I want to map each object to its
minimum associated value. The solutions below work,
but I would like to see prettier solutions...

Thank you,
Alan Isaac

===================================================================

import time, random
from itertools import groupby
from collections import defaultdict

class Pass:
pass

# arbitrary setup
keys = [Pass() for i in range(10)]*3
vals = [random.random() for i in range(30)]
kv = zip(keys,vals)
random.shuffle(kv)

#OBJECTIVE:
# find minimum val associated with each "key" in kv

print "method 1: brute force"
t=time.clock()
d = dict()
for k,v in kv:
if k in d:
if d[k] > v:
d[k] = v
else:
d[k] = v
print time.clock()-t
print d
print

print "method 2: groupby"
t=time.clock()
d = dict()
kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: id(x[0]))
for k, g in groupby( kv_sorted, key=lambda x: x[0] ):
d[k] = min(gi[1] for gi in g)
print time.clock()-t
print d
print

print "method 3: defaultdict"
t=time.clock()
d = defaultdict(list)
for k,v in kv:
d[k].append(v)
for k in d:
d[k] = min(d[k])
print time.clock()-t
print d
 
S

Steven Bethard

Alan said:
I have a small set of objects associated with a larger
set of values, and I want to map each object to its
minimum associated value. The solutions below work,
but I would like to see prettier solutions...
[snip]

# arbitrary setup
keys = [Pass() for i in range(10)]*3
vals = [random.random() for i in range(30)]
kv = zip(keys,vals)
random.shuffle(kv)

#OBJECTIVE:
# find minimum val associated with each "key" in kv
[snip]

print "method 3: defaultdict"
t=time.clock()
d = defaultdict(list)
for k,v in kv:
d[k].append(v)
for k in d:
d[k] = min(d[k])
print time.clock()-t
print d

This is definitely the approach I'd use. Seems "pretty" enough to me. ;-)

STeVe
 
A

Alan Isaac

Steven said:
[3rd approach] Seems "pretty" enough to me. ;-)

I find it most attractive of the lot.
But its costs would rise if the number
of values per object were large.

Anyway, I basically agree.

Thanks,
Alan
 
P

Paul Rubin

Alan Isaac said:
print "method 2: groupby"
t=time.clock()
d = dict()
kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: id(x[0]))

How about something like:

kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: (id(x[0]), x[1]))

Now do your groupby and the first element of each group is the minimum
for that group.
 
B

bearophileHUGS

I find the first and third solutions simpler to read, and the first
solution requires less memory, it probably works quite well with
Psyco, and it's easy to translate to other languages (that is
important for programs you want to use for a lot of time or in
different situations), so I'd use the first solution.

Bye,
bearophile
 
J

John Machin

I find the first and third solutions simpler to read, and the first
solution requires less memory, it probably works quite well with
Psyco, and it's easy to translate to other languages (that is
important for programs you want to use for a lot of time or in
different situations), so I'd use the first solution.

The first solution, once one changes "d = dict()" to "d = {}", is
quite free of any impediments to ease of reading, uses the minimum
necessary memory to build the required dict [and it's quite obvious by
inspection that this is so], and is the easiest to "translate" to
earlier versions of Python.
 
A

Alan Isaac

Paul said:
How about something like:

kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: (id(x[0]), x[1]))


You mean like this?

#sort by id and then value
kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: (id(x[0]),x[1]))
#groupby: first element in each group is object and its min value
d =dict( g.next() for k,g in groupby( kv_sorted, key=lambda x: x[0] ) )

Yes, that appears to be fastest and is
pretty easy to read.

Thanks,
Alan
 
A

Alan Isaac

Alan Isaac wrote:
#sort by id and then value
kv_sorted = sorted(kv, key=lambda x: (id(x[0]),x[1]))
#groupby: first element in each group is object and its min value
d =dict( g.next() for k,g in groupby( kv_sorted, key=lambda x: x[0] ) )

Yes, that appears to be fastest and is
pretty easy to read.

On average.
For the specified problem.
;-)
 
A

Alan Isaac

I'd use the first solution.

It can be speeded up a bit with
a try/except:

for k,v in kv:
try:
if d[k] > v:
d[k] = v
except KeyError:
d[k] = v

Cheers,
Alan Isaac
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,578
Members
45,052
Latest member
LucyCarper

Latest Threads

Top