FormView and stored proc data binding

Discussion in 'ASP .Net' started by =?Utf-8?B?SmVmZiBIYXJrYXZ5?=, Jun 9, 2006.

  1. Is this possible or am I barking up the wrong hydrant?

    I want to have a FormView (ASP.NET 2.0, obviously) on a web page that's
    populated via a stored procedure. There are two sections of the view that
    show data in sort of a parent-child relationship. I want to use a stored
    procedure for the update (same proc for both sections), and be able to update
    each section separately, but the column names from the retrieve procedure are
    different than the column names in the update procedure. It may sound funky,
    but for what it's doing the UI really makes sense. I have the retrieve
    working just fine, but I'll be damned if I can dope out how to take care of
    the update.

    I've been writing software a long time, but I'm relatively new to this .NET
    thing. It's frustrating, to say the least. Is it just me or has Redmond
    made data access *way* more complicated than it needs to be?

    thx
    jeff
    =?Utf-8?B?SmVmZiBIYXJrYXZ5?=, Jun 9, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. hansiman
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    485
    hansiman
    Feb 5, 2005
  2. David Lozzi
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,915
    David Lozzi
    Jun 1, 2005
  3. NevilleDNZ
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    422
    NevilleDNZ
    Aug 16, 2006
  4. Jean-Hugues ROBERT

    Why no Proc##[]=() ? Why no Proc##replace() ?

    Jean-Hugues ROBERT, May 1, 2004, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    14
    Views:
    267
    Jean-Hugues ROBERT
    May 5, 2004
  5. Minkoo Seo

    Proc vs lambda vs proc

    Minkoo Seo, Feb 4, 2007, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    19
    Views:
    228
    Brian Candler
    Feb 6, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page