hints on "new" code

F

FtM

Hello everyone,

first of all, I've cross-posted the same request on it.comp.lang.c
(the italian equivalent of clc) but, as you guys helped me many times
on similar themes I'm posting here too.

I'm open-sourcing some old projects that I don't manage to follow for
many reasons (hoping that someone will find them interesting) and I
start collecting many sparse functions grouping them in a library that
I keep updating.
Right now the structure is quite confusing, as I just put there the
code that could be replicated or useful somewhere else, and this is my
very first problem. Most of the library is formed by functions that
wraps Linux/Windows system-dependant calls, but there are a linked
list implementation, a TAP testing interface and a nice (in my
opinion) error-tracing mechanism.
I personally use the whole thing as a framework and, as I know that
any C programmer as something similar in his shelf, I'm asking for
some hints to give the library an organic way of being, while keeping
it as more C-programmer-friendly as I can.

In addiction, any comment regarding the pure ANSI-C89/90 part (linked-
lists, hash-table, the TAP testing and the error tracing
implementation) will be highly appreciated (it's impressive that,
after +6y and more programming in C on every possible type of
application, I still manage to discover juicy tricks on lists and
tables just talking to other coders...).

The link is: http://code.google.com/p/libmmp/

I didn't manage to make a compressed package but the svn repository is
up and running.
Thank you very much for any comment on this work!

Thank you very much, ciao!

P.S. To aswer immediately to the reply that me myself would have made,
I know that there are better library alternatives around: I simply
don't have time to migrate "dead" (at least for me) code on a new code-
base; more on, the functions that this library implements are so
basical that I hope that there will be no reason to change them in-
mass for something better, and even then, an hypothetical mantainer of
the projects based on my lib could change some of them easilly with a
little effort.
 
F

FtM

Hello everyone,

first of all, I've cross-posted the same request on it.comp.lang.c
(the italian equivalent of clc) but, as you guys helped me many times
on similar themes I'm posting here too.

I'm open-sourcing some old projects that I don't manage to follow for
many reasons (hoping that someone will find them interesting) and I
start collecting many sparse functions grouping them in a library that
I keep updating.
Right now the structure is quite confusing, as I just put there the
code that could be replicated or useful somewhere else, and this is my
very first problem. Most of the library is formed by functions that
wraps Linux/Windows system-dependant calls, but there are a linked
list implementation, a TAP testing interface and a nice (in my
opinion) error-tracing mechanism.
I personally use the whole thing as a framework and, as I know that
any C programmer as something similar in his shelf, I'm asking for
some hints to give the library an organic way of being, while keeping
it as more C-programmer-friendly as I can.

In addiction, any comment regarding the pure ANSI-C89/90 part (linked-
lists, hash-table, the TAP testing and the error tracing
implementation) will be highly appreciated (it's impressive that,
after +6y and more programming in C on every possible type of
application, I still manage to discover juicy tricks on lists and
tables just talking to other coders...).

The link is:http://code.google.com/p/libmmp/

I didn't manage to make a compressed package but the svn repository is
up and running.
Thank you very much for any comment on this work!

Thank you very much, ciao!

P.S. To aswer immediately to the reply that me myself would have made,
I know that there are better library alternatives around: I simply
don't have time to migrate "dead" (at least for me) code on a new code-
base; more on, the functions that this library implements are so
basical that I hope that there will be no reason to change them in-
mass for something better, and even then, an hypothetical mantainer of
the projects based on my lib could change some of them easilly with a
little effort.

So, anyone has nothing to say? Is it a good or bad sign? :-/
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,744
Messages
2,569,484
Members
44,903
Latest member
orderPeak8CBDGummies

Latest Threads

Top