P
PaulNaude
I have a concurrency violation which I try to hide. If I can elliminate it,
so much the better:
I have a parent and child datatable (datagrids for each). If the user edit a
record in the parent grid, the child grid has to follow suite. This is no
problem, but once one try to update the adapters, the parent is updated, but
when you come tho the child grid, the database has updated the rows allready
(because of its inherit relationships) and now see that the data adapter
wants to update the same records.
Now, although these records are actually identical and do not really need to
be updated, the database reports a concurrency violation and flags it in the
datagrid border for my user to see.
My code is written so as not to take action in such a case but the encircled
red exclamation mark still remains in the datagrid and if the user puts his
cursor over it, it states that a "concurancy violation affected 0 records".
How can I hide this visible indication of the error (or ellminate the error
in the first place)?
Hope u can help.
so much the better:
I have a parent and child datatable (datagrids for each). If the user edit a
record in the parent grid, the child grid has to follow suite. This is no
problem, but once one try to update the adapters, the parent is updated, but
when you come tho the child grid, the database has updated the rows allready
(because of its inherit relationships) and now see that the data adapter
wants to update the same records.
Now, although these records are actually identical and do not really need to
be updated, the database reports a concurrency violation and flags it in the
datagrid border for my user to see.
My code is written so as not to take action in such a case but the encircled
red exclamation mark still remains in the datagrid and if the user puts his
cursor over it, it states that a "concurancy violation affected 0 records".
How can I hide this visible indication of the error (or ellminate the error
in the first place)?
Hope u can help.