How can I get the arguments passed to the caller.

[Stefan Kanev]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hey guys.

I have a rather weird question. I want to write a function that
programatically determines the arguments passed to its caller. Say, if i do

$stuff = []

def bar(arg)
foo
end

def foo
first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

I know it is quite the contrived question, but I'm not interested in doing
something practical. Any leads?

 

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hey guys.

I have a rather weird question. I want to write a function that
programatically determines the arguments passed to its caller. Say, if i do

$stuff = []

def bar(arg)
foo
end

def foo
first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

I don't think this is possible.

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

But to get this result you could write:

(def bar(*args)
($stuff = args)
end)

(bar 42)

$stuff --> [42]

 

[James Coglan]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

I have a rather weird question. I want to write a function that
programatically determines the arguments passed to its caller. Say, if i do

$stuff = []

def bar(arg)
foo
end

def foo
first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

I think the closest you're going to get is for the calling function to pass
its binding so that foo can read from it:

def bar(*args)
foo(binding)
end
=> nil
def foo(env)
puts env.eval("args.first")
end
=> nil
bar 'something'
something

I don't think you can do this transparently. You can't even refer to the
argument list within a single method (I'm thinking of the 'arguments' object
in JavaScript) without mentioning the arguments by name.

 

[Stefan Kanev]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

So, suppose I want to get evil and go dig into frames and so on. I've seen
ruby-debug do something close. Is there a part of the standard library that
allows you to introspect that way (if so, I could not find it), or a gem
maybe? And if not and I'm bend on writing C code to achieve it, where should
I start looking?

I have a rather weird question. I want to write a function that
programatically determines the arguments passed to its caller. Say, if i do

$stuff = []

def bar(arg)
foo
end

def foo
first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

I think the closest you're going to get is for the calling function to pass
its binding so that foo can read from it:

def bar(*args)
foo(binding)
end
=> nil
def foo(env)
puts env.eval("args.first")
end
=> nil
bar 'something'
something

I don't think you can do this transparently. You can't even refer to the
argument list within a single method (I'm thinking of the 'arguments'
object
in JavaScript) without mentioning the arguments by name.

 

[Robert Dober]

So, suppose I want to get evil and go dig into frames and so on. I've seen
ruby-debug do something close. Is there a part of the standard library that
allows you to introspect that way (if so, I could not find it), or a gem
maybe? And if not and I'm bend on writing C code to achieve it, where should
I start looking?

Depends, for methods with *args and optional arguments you have
definitely some heavy lifting to do. For all other methods however
it's easy:
method( caller.first.sub(/.*in ./,"").sub(/.$/,"") ).arity
Probably not good enough?
cheers
Robert

 

[Brian Candler]

first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

I think the closest you're going to get is for the calling function to
pass
its binding so that foo can read from it:

In which case, it might as well just pass its args instead

There is the Binding.of_caller hack which you can find through a google
search.

Maybe you could combine this with Kernel#local_variables or
Binding#local_variables to do what you want? That's what debug.rb does

when /^\s*l(?cal)?\s*$/
var_list(eval("local_variables", binding), binding)

and just use eval to read them:

def var_list(ary, binding)
ary.sort!
for v in ary
stdout.printf " %s => %s\n", v, eval(v, binding).inspect
end
end

 

[Stefan Kanev]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Thanks for the advice. I would have never had thought of something as
straightforward as evaling 'local_variables' in the binding. Unfortunatelly,
I believe that this doesn't yield the arguments if they are not named.

I'm actually trying, out of curiosity, to implement a very straightforward
idea:

%w{more chunky bacon}.each { puts it.length }

Like, have *it* to actually be the 'implicit blog argument', not unlike
perl's $_. Again, I'm doing that out of curiosity. Any ideas how I can
accomplish it without touching the interpreter's C code?

first_arg = ....
$stuff << first_arg
end

bar(42)

# By this point, $stuff would be [42]

I think the closest you're going to get is for the calling function to
pass
its binding so that foo can read from it:

In which case, it might as well just pass its args instead

There is the Binding.of_caller hack which you can find through a google
search.

Maybe you could combine this with Kernel#local_variables or
Binding#local_variables to do what you want? That's what debug.rb does

when /^\s*l(?cal)?\s*$/
var_list(eval("local_variables", binding), binding)

and just use eval to read them:

def var_list(ary, binding)
ary.sort!
for v in ary
stdout.printf " %s => %s\n", v, eval(v, binding).inspect
end
end

 

[Robert Klemme]

Thanks for the advice. I would have never had thought of something as
straightforward as evaling 'local_variables' in the binding. Unfortunatelly,
I believe that this doesn't yield the arguments if they are not named.

I'm actually trying, out of curiosity, to implement a very straightforward
idea:

%w{more chunky bacon}.each { puts it.length }

Like, have *it* to actually be the 'implicit blog argument', not unlike
perl's $_. Again, I'm doing that out of curiosity. Any ideas how I can
accomplish it without touching the interpreter's C code?

IMHO you can't because the current value is only known by method
#each. Wait, you could cook something up using thread local variables

18:41:58 tmp$ ./it.rb
4
6
5
18:42:41 tmp$ cat it.rb
#!/bin/env ruby

def it
Thread.current[:each].last rescue nil
end

class Array
alias _each each
def each(&b)
stack = Thread.current[:each] ||= []
_each do |val|
stack.push val
begin
b.call
ensure
stack.pop
end
end
end
end

%w{more chunky bacon}.each { puts it.length }
18:42:42 tmp$

But note that you have to change *all* implementations of #each which
is difficult to achieve because classes can spring into existence all
the time. Alternatively write a global each which receives the
Enumerable as argument.

Cheers

robert

 

[Stefan Kanev]

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

And I have to override Array#each. I'll also need to override #map, #select
and so on. Not a good deal

Thanks for the advice. I would have never had thought of something as
straightforward as evaling 'local_variables' in the binding. Unfortunatelly,
I believe that this doesn't yield the arguments if they are not named.

I'm actually trying, out of curiosity, to implement a very straightforward
idea:

%w{more chunky bacon}.each { puts it.length }

Like, have *it* to actually be the 'implicit blog argument', not unlike
perl's $_. Again, I'm doing that out of curiosity. Any ideas how I can
accomplish it without touching the interpreter's C code?

IMHO you can't because the current value is only known by method
#each. Wait, you could cook something up using thread local variables

18:41:58 tmp$ ./it.rb
4
6
5
18:42:41 tmp$ cat it.rb
#!/bin/env ruby

def it
Thread.current[:each].last rescue nil
end

class Array
alias _each each
def each(&b)
stack = Thread.current[:each] ||= []
_each do |val|
stack.push val
begin
b.call
ensure
stack.pop
end
end
end
end

%w{more chunky bacon}.each { puts it.length }
18:42:42 tmp$

But note that you have to change *all* implementations of #each which
is difficult to achieve because classes can spring into existence all
the time. Alternatively write a global each which receives the
Enumerable as argument.

Cheers

robert