A
Antoninus Twink
I always felt he was treated more like the grumpy old
farm dog. Ultimately useless, but nice to pet occasionally.
Either way, he's definitely off to the glue factory now.
I always felt he was treated more like the grumpy old
farm dog. Ultimately useless, but nice to pet occasionally.
Santosh, you're rapidly becoming a bore in your attempts to make your
bones. Heathfield is big enough and ugly enough to take care of
himself. As, I am sure, is Robbie.
I'm not reading any more of your word games. Enough.
Antoninus Twink said:Give it up, Santosh - the craven submissiveness and fawning admiration
that constitutes your relationship with RJH is obvious to everyone.
Gimme a break - you're the only one here with a dribbling, fetishistic
obsession with Heathfield. He can do no wrong in your eyes.
Richard said:I hadn't bothered to read his whining. Incredible.
Even his mistakes are "Genuine" or mere "reversals of the truth"
according to Santosh. I suspect RH's morning ablutions are
"uncompressed diamonds" or other such nonsense in Santosh's world.
Honestly, if, like me, you visit this group in "stop gap", its
astonishing to see how Santosh has changed from being a bright young
buck with all the rebelliousness of youth to a fawning lackey.
Richard said:CBF, however, is just a waste of disk space IMO. He is wrong more often
than he is right. And he is downright rude and objectionable at his
best.
Give it up, Santosh - the craven submissiveness and fawning admiration
that constitutes your relationship with RJH is obvious to everyone.
Gimme a break - you're the only one here with a dribbling, fetishistic
obsession with Heathfield. He can do no wrong in your eyes.
That's as may be, but he seems to have got a bit wrapped in this one for
some reason. And the bottom line of this thread is abundantly clear to
anyone who read as far as RHs polite reply where he pretty much agreed
with each and every point I had made.
Richard said:What is it with you and apologising for other peoples mistakes?
santosh said:Richard wrote:
.... snip ...
*sigh* Once more:
I did _not_ jump to RJH's defence. I jumped in to correct Robbie
Hatley's mistake. Can you make out the difference, or are you far
too biased against RJH that you see a correction to a post aimed
at a post that was a correction to a post by RJH, as a defence of
RJH?
CBFalconer said:You do realize that that Richard is a known troll? Why feed it?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.