# how to implement doubly linked lists using only one pointer?

Discussion in 'C++' started by tonywinslow1986@hotmail.com, Dec 23, 2006.

1. ### Guest

I'm reading MIT's book "Introduction to Algorithms".
The following is one of the excercises from it:
<
10.2-8
Explain how to implement doubly linked lists using only one pointer
value np[x] per item instead of the usual two (next and prev). Assume
that all pointer values can be interpreted as k-bit integers, and
define np[x] to be np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x], the k-bit
"exclusive-or" of next[x] and prev[x]. (The value NIL is represented by

0.) Be sure to describe what information is needed to access the head
of the list. Show how to implement the SEARCH, INSERT, and DELETE
operations on such a list. Also show how to reverse such a list in O(1)

time.
/>

Could anybody tell me how to solve it? Thank you!!!

, Dec 23, 2006

2. ### Joe SeighGuest

wrote:
> I'm reading MIT's book "Introduction to Algorithms".
> The following is one of the excercises from it:
> <
> 10.2-8
> Explain how to implement doubly linked lists using only one pointer
> value np[x] per item instead of the usual two (next and prev). Assume
> that all pointer values can be interpreted as k-bit integers, and
> define np[x] to be np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x], the k-bit
> "exclusive-or" of next[x] and prev[x]. (The value NIL is represented by
>
> 0.) Be sure to describe what information is needed to access the head
> of the list. Show how to implement the SEARCH, INSERT, and DELETE
> operations on such a list. Also show how to reverse such a list in O(1)
>
> time.
> />
>
> Could anybody tell me how to solve it? Thank you!!!
>

The book all but told you how to solve it.
If anything XOR'd with itself is zero, solve
the equation

np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x]

for next[x].

To reverse the list, how would you revers a regular doubly
linked list with next and prev pointers?

--
Joe Seigh

When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.

Joe Seigh, Dec 23, 2006

3. ### Michal NazarewiczGuest

"" <> writes:
> Explain how to implement doubly linked lists using only one pointer
> value np[x] per item instead of the usual two (next and prev). Assume
> that all pointer values can be interpreted as k-bit integers, and
> define np[x] to be np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x], the k-bit
> "exclusive-or" of next[x] and prev[x]. (The value NIL is represented by
>
> 0.) Be sure to describe what information is needed to access the head
> of the list. Show how to implement the SEARCH, INSERT, and DELETE
> operations on such a list. Also show how to reverse such a list in O(1)
> time.

--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>---<jid:mina86*chrome.pl>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Michal Nazarewicz, Dec 23, 2006
4. ### Guest

> The book all but told you how to solve it.
> If anything XOR'd with itself is zero, solve
> the equation
>
> np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x]
>
> for next[x].

That's the point! It seems that I know nothing about bit computations,
so silly questions are raised here.

, Dec 24, 2006
5. ### Guest

> If anything XOR'd with itself is zero, solve
> the equation
>
> np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x]
>
> for next[x].

how to solve that equation? i'm confused!

, Dec 24, 2006
6. ### Jim LangstonGuest

<> wrote in message
news:...
>> If anything XOR'd with itself is zero, solve
>> the equation
>>
>> np[x] = next[x] XOR prev[x]
>>
>> for next[x].

>
> how to solve that equation? i'm confused!

Play with bit math.

int X = 1;
int Y = 3;

now output X and Y, X or Y, X xor Y, etc... Find out why they come out the
way they do.

Jim Langston, Dec 24, 2006
7. ### Guest

> Play with bit math.
>
> int X = 1;
> int Y = 3;
>
> now output X and Y, X or Y, X xor Y, etc... Find out why they come out the
> way they do.

i've known that:
if A ^ B = C, then B = A ^ C, A = B^C.
but anyway how to solve that equation with only np[x] given?

, Dec 24, 2006
8. ### Simon G BestGuest

Hello!

The original question is fun!

wrote:
>
> i've known that:
> if A ^ B = C, then B = A ^ C, A = B^C.

What's X ^ X? What's (X ^ X) ^ Y?

> but anyway how to solve that equation with only np[x] given?
>

You won't have "only np[x] given".

The answer, as they say, is in the (original) question. It's all a
matter of knowing where to begin. You /will/ know where to begin. Just
use your head. Start at the beginning. After all, nothing will come
from nothing, as they say.

Simon

--
What happens if I mention Leader Kibo in my .signature?

Simon G Best, Dec 29, 2006
9. ### Risto LankinenGuest

<> wrote in message
news:...
>
> i've known that:
> if A ^ B = C, then B = A ^ C, A = B^C.
> but anyway how to solve that equation with only np[x] given?

I think this is an easy way to communicate the concept:

essentially equivalent when it comes to implementing the
trick of this method, but much easier to comprehend).

First, every node has a field to hold the distance from its
previous-node to its next-node. Note that this is exactly
equal to the sum of the distances from its previous-node
to itself, and from itself to its next-node.

When you iterate, you need pointers to two successive
nodes. Call them A and B. It is easy to compute the
distance between the nodes (B-A), and from there it is
easy to compute the address of A's previous-node [A's
sum-of-distances is reduced by (B-A) and the remainder
applied as an offset to A's address] or of B's next-node
[left as an exercise].

- Risto -

Risto Lankinen, Jan 2, 2007