How to send up a multi-dimensional array in a property of type system.object?

P

psm

I have a web service that returns Field[][]. The Field object contains
Name (type string) and Val (type object).

I am using it to return back a user-defined selection of properties of
an task object, hence Val being of type object.

This web service works fine, until I try to put another Field[][]
(containing an array of historical values of the task object) in to
the Val of one field, and then I get a SOAP Exception:

Unable to cast object of type Field[][] to Field[]

I have to say that I'm struggling to understand the error. I know that
the web service can return Field[][] at the top level, so I don't
understand why it can't cope with it further down the object hierachy

I've tried all manner of XML serialization attributes, and nothing
makes a difference.

Any suggestions, other than wrapping the second Field[][] in another
class, which I'd rather not do, as the historical task data is in the
same format as the current task data, so it doesn't seem to make sense
to have different objects for them?

Cheers,

Paul
 
J

John Saunders [MVP]

I have a web service that returns Field[][]. The Field object contains
Name (type string) and Val (type object).

I am using it to return back a user-defined selection of properties of
an task object, hence Val being of type object.

This web service works fine, until I try to put another Field[][]
(containing an array of historical values of the task object) in to
the Val of one field, and then I get a SOAP Exception:

Unable to cast object of type Field[][] to Field[]

I have to say that I'm struggling to understand the error. I know that
the web service can return Field[][] at the top level, so I don't
understand why it can't cope with it further down the object hierachy

I've tried all manner of XML serialization attributes, and nothing
makes a difference.

Any suggestions, other than wrapping the second Field[][] in another
class, which I'd rather not do, as the historical task data is in the
same format as the current task data, so it doesn't seem to make sense
to have different objects for them?

It's really amazing that this works at all.

Consider that you're serializing your objects into XML for some other piece
of code to deserialize. You aren't giving that client code much information
about what you're sending. Have you looked at the generated WSDL? The Val
field is declared:

<s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="Val" />

This only works at all because the type information will be included in the
XML for the primitive types:

<Val xsi:type="xsd:dateTime">2007-07-19T15:39:52.4875-04:00</Val>

Which xsi:type should it use for Field[][]?

BTW, it _does_ work if you wrap the Field[][]. Furthermore, if you don't
want the two to be different, then you should always use the wrapped
version. Have your webmethod return WrappedArrayOfArrayOfField. That will
return something like this:

<Val xsi:type="FieldWrapper">
<Wrapped>
<ArrayOfField>
<Field>
<Name>name1</Name>
<Val xsi:type="xsd:int">1</Val>
</Field>
<Field>
<Name>name2</Name>
<Val xsi:type="xsd:string">abc</Val>
</Field>
</ArrayOfField>
...
 
P

psm

It's really amazing that this works at all.

Consider that you're serializing your objects into XML for some other piece
of code to deserialize. You aren't giving that client code much information
about what you're sending. Have you looked at the generated WSDL? The Val
field is declared:

<s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="Val" />

This only works at all because the type information will be included in the
XML for the primitive types:

<Val xsi:type="xsd:dateTime">2007-07-19T15:39:52.4875-04:00</Val>

Which xsi:type should it use for Field[][]?

BTW, it _does_ work if you wrap the Field[][]. Furthermore, if you don't
want the two to be different, then you should always use the wrapped
version. Have your webmethod return WrappedArrayOfArrayOfField. That will
return something like this:

<Val xsi:type="FieldWrapper">
<Wrapped>
<ArrayOfField>
<Field>
<Name>name1</Name>
<Val xsi:type="xsd:int">1</Val>
</Field>
<Field>
<Name>name2</Name>
<Val xsi:type="xsd:string">abc</Val>
</Field>
</ArrayOfField>
...

That's the part that I don't get; I have looked at the WSDL (far too
many times!), and I can see the overall result node:

<s:element name="GetTasksResponse">
<s:complexType>
<s:sequence>
<s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"
name="GetTasksResult"
type="tns:ArrayOfArrayOfField" />
</s:sequence>
</s:complexType>
</s:element>

So, in answer to your question:
Which xsi:type should it use for Field[][]?

I would have thought tns:ArrayOfArrayOfField would be the type it
would serialize as. There is a node with that name in the WSDL
already, so I don't understand why it can't utilise that?

I've tried putting a string[][] into Val, and that blows up too, so it
seems that it's just a problem putting a multi-dimensional (well,
jagged) array into the Val.

In fact, we just tried returning a jagged array from a web method that
returns one System.object, tried returning string[][], and that
doesn't work either, so that seems to confirm that you just can't
return a jagged array as System.object. I'm intrigued as to why that
is the case though.

Cheers,

Paul
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,755
Messages
2,569,536
Members
45,013
Latest member
KatriceSwa

Latest Threads

Top