HTML-Kit 292 ??

Discussion in 'HTML' started by Jenn, May 18, 2010.

  1. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/

    I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite and
    another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with them... but
    I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be pretty good.

    Any opinions on it?
    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 18, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Jenn

    Neredbojias Guest

    On 18 May 2010, "Jenn" <>
    wrote:

    > Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    > http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >
    > I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite
    > and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with
    > them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be
    > pretty good.
    >
    > Any opinions on it?


    Maybe you chased away all the speaking men and none of the 2 women use
    it...

    --
    Neredbojias

    http://www.neredbojias.org/
    http://www.neredbojias.net/
    Neredbojias, May 19, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Jenn

    SAZ Guest

    In article <hsutqh$mot$-september.org>,
    areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >
    > Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    > http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >
    > I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite and
    > another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with them... but
    > I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be pretty good.
    >
    > Any opinions on it?


    I use it daily. This is not WYSIWYG, but rather a full featured, fully
    customizable text editor with hundreds of plug ins for just about
    anything you could imagine. No nag screens or reminders, just free all
    the way, no strings attached. Although it is no longer under
    development, it's still way ahead of some of the newer stuff out there.

    There is also a paid version called HTML-Kit Tools that is still a work
    in progress with weekly updates. It is rapidly becoming my favorite
    over the free 292 version. It's worth every penny.

    Chami, the developer, runs the support newsgroups and personally answers
    every question or problem in less than 12 hours, not bad for freeware.
    There are many others (myself included) in the groups that will respond
    sooner if we know the answer.

    Try HTML-Kit 292, you won't be sorry.
    SAZ, May 19, 2010
    #3
  4. Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    <> writing in
    news:hsutqh$mot$-september.org:

    > Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    > http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >
    > I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite
    > and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with
    > them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be
    > pretty good.
    >
    > Any opinions on it?


    I used 292 for years, and then when Tools came out, I paid for my
    subscriptiong to 292 and downloaded the beta aka Tools (build 300).
    As Saz says, it's worth every penny, and I use it every day.

    Differences between 292 and Tools (build 300):
    1. Code folding
    2. Bracket matching
    3. Projects
    4. Multi-page templates
    [http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info/kit_multipage.php]
    5. Open documents history (goes back quite while, a month or more)
    6. HTML-Tidy built in
    7. Lots of PHP plugins, including PHP beautify
    8. Search and replace, with Regx, across document or files, or
    directories

    292 has more plugins, but a lot of the plugins were transferred into
    Tools.

    There is also a trial download of Tools:
    http://www.html-kit.com/tools/download/

    I highly recommend it.

    --
    Adrienne Boswell at Home
    Arbpen Web Site Design Services
    http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
    Please respond to the group so others can share
    Adrienne Boswell, May 19, 2010
    #4
  5. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    SAZ wrote:
    > In article <hsutqh$mot$-september.org>,
    > areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >>
    >> Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    >> http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >>
    >> I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle
    >> Lite and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around
    >> with them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it
    >> might be pretty good.
    >>
    >> Any opinions on it?

    >
    > I use it daily. This is not WYSIWYG, but rather a full featured, fully
    > customizable text editor with hundreds of plug ins for just about
    > anything you could imagine. No nag screens or reminders, just free
    > all the way, no strings attached. Although it is no longer under
    > development, it's still way ahead of some of the newer stuff out
    > there.
    >
    > There is also a paid version called HTML-Kit Tools that is still a
    > work in progress with weekly updates. It is rapidly becoming my
    > favorite over the free 292 version. It's worth every penny.
    >
    > Chami, the developer, runs the support newsgroups and personally
    > answers every question or problem in less than 12 hours, not bad for
    > freeware. There are many others (myself included) in the groups that
    > will respond sooner if we know the answer.
    >
    > Try HTML-Kit 292, you won't be sorry.


    Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try.

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    Jenn, May 19, 2010
    #5
  6. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    > Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    > <> writing in
    > news:hsutqh$mot$-september.org:
    >
    >> Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    >> http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >>
    >> I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite
    >> and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with
    >> them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be
    >> pretty good.
    >>
    >> Any opinions on it?

    >
    > I used 292 for years, and then when Tools came out, I paid for my
    > subscriptiong to 292 and downloaded the beta aka Tools (build 300).
    > As Saz says, it's worth every penny, and I use it every day.
    >
    > Differences between 292 and Tools (build 300):
    > 1. Code folding
    > 2. Bracket matching
    > 3. Projects
    > 4. Multi-page templates
    > [http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info/kit_multipage.php]
    > 5. Open documents history (goes back quite while, a month or more)
    > 6. HTML-Tidy built in
    > 7. Lots of PHP plugins, including PHP beautify
    > 8. Search and replace, with Regx, across document or files, or
    > directories
    >
    > 292 has more plugins, but a lot of the plugins were transferred into
    > Tools.
    >
    > There is also a trial download of Tools:
    > http://www.html-kit.com/tools/download/
    >
    > I highly recommend it.


    Think I'll try the 292 version first. It looked like it would be alot of
    fun to play with all the stuff it can do. Thanks!

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    Jenn, May 19, 2010
    #6
  7. Jenn

    Sjeef Guest

    "Jenn" <> schreef in bericht
    news:hsutqh$mot$-september.org...
    > Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    > http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >
    > I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle Lite and
    > another one called Simple Css and have been playing around with them...
    > but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it might be pretty good.
    >
    > Any opinions on it?
    > --
    > Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    > http://pqlr.org/bbs/


    I'm using HTML-Kit 292 for years now and am very satisfied with it.
    Also I have translated the main menu into the Dutch language and doing that
    I learned a lot how to use this excellent editor.
    Together with TopStyle Lite for CSS is a good combination.
    Chami, the developer of the Kit, has worked out a compleet new editor,
    HTML-Kit Tools (version 300) and is also developping well.
    And the price for Tools is moderated.

    So I recommend it to you Jenn.

    Regards,

    Gerard Schaefers
    Amsterdam NL

    http://www.sjeef.eu
    Sjeef, May 19, 2010
    #7
  8. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Sjeef wrote:
    > "Jenn" <> schreef in bericht
    > news:hsutqh$mot$-september.org...
    >> Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    >> http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >>
    >> I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle
    >> Lite and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around
    >> with them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it
    >> might be pretty good. Any opinions on it?
    >> --
    >> Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    >> http://pqlr.org/bbs/

    >
    > I'm using HTML-Kit 292 for years now and am very satisfied with it.
    > Also I have translated the main menu into the Dutch language and
    > doing that I learned a lot how to use this excellent editor.
    > Together with TopStyle Lite for CSS is a good combination.
    > Chami, the developer of the Kit, has worked out a compleet new editor,
    > HTML-Kit Tools (version 300) and is also developping well.
    > And the price for Tools is moderated.
    >
    > So I recommend it to you Jenn.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Gerard Schaefers
    > Amsterdam NL
    >
    > http://www.sjeef.eu


    Thanks for the info, Gerard. I also downloaded the TopStyle Lite for CSS and
    have been playing with that program, too.

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 19, 2010
    #8
  9. Jenn

    dorayme Guest

    In article <ht0s1t$rbc$-september.org>,
    "Jenn" <> wrote:

    > Thanks for the info, Gerard. I also downloaded the TopStyle Lite for CSS and
    > have been playing with that program, too.


    When I was learning CSS and HTML I found it actually beneficial
    to have as plain a piece of paper or text editor (like Wordpad)
    as it is possible to have for the simple reason that there was
    less to have to worry about or learn than CSS and HTML itself.
    Once into actual website making and managing for real, then I
    found some of the facilities (but not many) of the better editors
    useful. Just my $17.65 worth. (Hey! My thoughts are not cheap and
    I don't give them away freely.)

    --
    dorayme
    dorayme, May 19, 2010
    #9
  10. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    dorayme wrote:
    > In article <ht0s1t$rbc$-september.org>,
    > "Jenn" <> wrote:
    >
    >> Thanks for the info, Gerard. I also downloaded the TopStyle Lite for
    >> CSS and have been playing with that program, too.

    >
    > When I was learning CSS and HTML I found it actually beneficial
    > to have as plain a piece of paper or text editor (like Wordpad)
    > as it is possible to have for the simple reason that there was
    > less to have to worry about or learn than CSS and HTML itself.
    > Once into actual website making and managing for real, then I
    > found some of the facilities (but not many) of the better editors
    > useful. Just my $17.65 worth. (Hey! My thoughts are not cheap and
    > I don't give them away freely.)


    I did the same thing. I began using Notepad and then bought a program
    called Ultra-Edit, which was just a color version, more or less, with a few
    extras. That's about all I used it for, anyway. At work my pc has
    Dreamweaver on it and the one thing I use it for, coding, it does have the
    ability to give you tips, like the closing tag, or what attributes are
    available.

    Do you use either TopStyle or Html-Kit? I'm not wearing any rose-colored
    glasses thinking I'm going to memorize all the possible styles attributes
    available, so I was thinking it would be nice to have the TopStyle Lite to
    play with, at least. :)

    Hey.. if I give you a $20 can you make change? :D


    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #10
  11. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Jenn wrote:
    > SAZ wrote:
    >> In article <hsutqh$mot$-september.org>,
    >> areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >>>
    >>> Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    >>> http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >>>
    >>> I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle
    >>> Lite and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around
    >>> with them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it
    >>> might be pretty good.
    >>>
    >>> Any opinions on it?

    >>
    >> I use it daily. This is not WYSIWYG, but rather a full featured,
    >> fully customizable text editor with hundreds of plug ins for just
    >> about anything you could imagine. No nag screens or reminders, just
    >> free all the way, no strings attached. Although it is no longer
    >> under development, it's still way ahead of some of the newer stuff
    >> out there.
    >>
    >> There is also a paid version called HTML-Kit Tools that is still a
    >> work in progress with weekly updates. It is rapidly becoming my
    >> favorite over the free 292 version. It's worth every penny.
    >>
    >> Chami, the developer, runs the support newsgroups and personally
    >> answers every question or problem in less than 12 hours, not bad for
    >> freeware. There are many others (myself included) in the groups that
    >> will respond sooner if we know the answer.
    >>
    >> Try HTML-Kit 292, you won't be sorry.

    >
    > Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try.


    ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I think
    I'm in love ... <g>

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #11
  12. Jenn

    Sjeef Guest

    "Jenn" <> schreef in bericht
    news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org...
    > Jenn wrote:
    >> SAZ wrote:
    >>> In article <hsutqh$mot$-september.org>,
    >>> areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >>>>
    >>>> Has anyone ever used HTML-Kit 292 ?
    >>>> http://www.htmlkit.com/download/next/
    >>>>
    >>>> I was looking around at various editors today.. I found TopStyle
    >>>> Lite and another one called Simple Css and have been playing around
    >>>> with them... but I also found the HTML-Kit292 that looks like it
    >>>> might be pretty good.
    >>>>
    >>>> Any opinions on it?
    >>>
    >>> I use it daily. This is not WYSIWYG, but rather a full featured,
    >>> fully customizable text editor with hundreds of plug ins for just
    >>> about anything you could imagine. No nag screens or reminders, just
    >>> free all the way, no strings attached. Although it is no longer
    >>> under development, it's still way ahead of some of the newer stuff
    >>> out there.
    >>>
    >>> There is also a paid version called HTML-Kit Tools that is still a
    >>> work in progress with weekly updates. It is rapidly becoming my
    >>> favorite over the free 292 version. It's worth every penny.
    >>>
    >>> Chami, the developer, runs the support newsgroups and personally
    >>> answers every question or problem in less than 12 hours, not bad for
    >>> freeware. There are many others (myself included) in the groups that
    >>> will respond sooner if we know the answer.
    >>>
    >>> Try HTML-Kit 292, you won't be sorry.

    >>
    >> Thanks for the info. I'll give it a try.

    >
    > ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I think
    > I'm in love ... <g>
    >
    > --
    > Jenn (from Oklahoma)


    Using a program like Dreamweaver you have to go an university to learn to
    work with it.
    <BIGGRIN>Working with HTML-Kit only primary school is sufficient. </BIGGRIN>

    Gerard Schaefers
    Amsterdam, NL
    Sjeef, May 20, 2010
    #12
  13. Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    <> writing in
    news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:

    > ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    > think I'm in love ... <g>
    >


    Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at news.html-kit.com.
    If you have questions, post over there.

    --
    Adrienne Boswell at Home
    Arbpen Web Site Design Services
    http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
    Please respond to the group so others can share
    Adrienne Boswell, May 20, 2010
    #13
  14. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    > Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    > <> writing in
    > news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    >
    >> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    >> think I'm in love ... <g>
    >>

    >
    > Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    > news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.


    is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #14
  15. Jenn

    SAZ Guest

    In article <ht3ifk$8tk$-september.org>,
    areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >
    > Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    > > Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    > > <> writing in
    > > news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    > >
    > >> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    > >> think I'm in love ... <g>
    > >>

    > >
    > > Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    > > news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.

    >
    > is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?



    news.html-kit.com
    SAZ, May 20, 2010
    #15
  16. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Jenn wrote:
    > Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    >> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    >> <> writing in
    >> news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    >>
    >>> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    >>> think I'm in love ... <g>
    >>>

    >>
    >> Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    >> news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.

    >
    > is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?


    another question til I find that group ...

    I'm setting up my favorites tab while playing with the different
    functionality...

    Using the insert image tool lets you conveniently search for an image to
    insert and it puts the code in for you.

    Like this:
    <img alt="gimg728x90 (28K)"
    src="/Documents%20and%20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gimg728x90.jpg"
    height="90" width="728" />

    Is there a way to alter the order of what this inserts to like this:
    <img
    src="/Documents%20and%20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gimg728x90.jpg"
    width="728" height="90" alt="gimg728x90 (28K)" />

    and set a relative path for all images before the image filename?

    thanks....
    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #16
  17. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    SAZ wrote:
    > In article <ht3ifk$8tk$-september.org>,
    > areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >>
    >> Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    >>> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    >>> <> writing in
    >>> news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    >>>
    >>>> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    >>>> think I'm in love ... <g>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    >>> news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.

    >>
    >> is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?

    >
    >
    > news.html-kit.com


    ahh ok .. I added the new NNTP server .. thanks!

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #17
  18. Jenn

    Jenn Guest

    Jenn wrote:
    > SAZ wrote:
    >> In article <ht3ifk$8tk$-september.org>,
    >> areswhatthisemailisanyway says...
    >>>
    >>> Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    >>>> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    >>>> <> writing in
    >>>> news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    >>>>
    >>>>> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and
    >>>>> I think I'm in love ... <g>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    >>>> news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.
    >>>
    >>> is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?

    >>
    >>
    >> news.html-kit.com

    >
    > ahh ok .. I added the new NNTP server .. thanks!


    well.. it appears I can't use that forum unless I pay for a license? bummer

    --
    Jenn (from Oklahoma)
    http://pqlr.org/bbs/
    Jenn, May 20, 2010
    #18
  19. Jenn

    dorayme Guest

    In article <ht417f$opb$-september.org>,
    "Jenn" <> wrote:

    > Jenn wrote:
    > > Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    > >> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    > >> <> writing in
    > >> news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    > >>
    > >>> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    > >>> think I'm in love ... <g>
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >> Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    > >> news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.

    > >
    > > is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?

    >
    > another question til I find that group ...
    >
    > I'm setting up my favorites tab while playing with the different
    > functionality...
    >
    > Using the insert image tool lets you conveniently search for an image to
    > insert and it puts the code in for you.
    >
    > Like this:
    > <img alt="gimg728x90 (28K)"
    > src="/Documents%20and%20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gimg728x90
    > .jpg"
    > height="90" width="728" />
    >


    Don't forget to replace the alt text with something more
    appropriate. I have a small pill that can be taken (I take two
    myself before marking up) that helps you figure what is right for
    the occasion. Anyone who wants a bottle of 100 (trust me, they
    work), please send $US24.75.

    > Is there a way to alter the order of what this inserts to like this:
    > <img
    > src="/Documents%20and%20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gimg728x90
    > .jpg"
    > width="728" height="90" alt="gimg728x90 (28K)" />
    >
    > and set a relative path for all images before the image filename?
    >


    Surely not? But if there is a way from inside this editor, be
    careful Jenn, it is way too smart a program and possibly
    dangerous. Use it only when other people are around. <g>

    --
    dorayme
    dorayme, May 21, 2010
    #19
  20. Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    <> writing in
    news:ht417f$opb$-september.org:

    > Jenn wrote:
    >> Adrienne Boswell wrote:
    >>> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed "Jenn"
    >>> <> writing in
    >>> news:ht2b1i$96p$-september.org:
    >>>
    >>>> ok I've been playing with this HTML-kit 292 and TopStyle Lite and I
    >>>> think I'm in love ... <g>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Jenn, that's great. You can find the HTML-Kit groups at
    >>> news.html-kit.com. If you have questions, post over there.

    >>
    >> is that an NNTP group I can get to on Usenet?

    >
    > another question til I find that group ...
    >
    > I'm setting up my favorites tab while playing with the different
    > functionality...
    >
    > Using the insert image tool lets you conveniently search for an image
    > to insert and it puts the code in for you.
    >
    > Like this:
    ><img alt="gimg728x90 (28K)"
    > src="/Documents%20and%

    20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gim
    > g728x90.jpg" height="90" width="728" />
    >
    > Is there a way to alter the order of what this inserts to like this:
    ><img
    > src="/Documents%20and%

    20Settings/computername.US/Desktop/foldername/gim
    > g728x90.jpg" width="728" height="90" alt="gimg728x90 (28K)" />
    >
    > and set a relative path for all images before the image filename?
    >
    > thanks....


    It will do that if the file has not been saved, or it will do that if
    the image is not in the same directory where the file is saved.

    Usually, I have all the images in the same directory where the files
    are, usually my directory structure is something like:

    \clientname - the files that will go on the production server
    \clientname\docs - for documents they may have sent me
    \clientname\ufo - for editable images that are not jpg, gif or png
    \clientname\sql - for sql statements that I have saved

    I very rarely use an images folder, but if there are a lot of images in
    different categories I might do something like:

    \clientname\kitchen
    \clientname\bathroom
    \clientname\livingroom


    --
    Adrienne Boswell at Home
    Arbpen Web Site Design Services
    http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
    Please respond to the group so others can share
    Adrienne Boswell, May 21, 2010
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Sandip Chitale
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,270
    Sandip Chitale
    Jun 30, 2003
  2. Daniel Polansky
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    737
    Daniel Polansky
    Oct 11, 2004
  3. John Latter
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    481
    John Latter
    Sep 9, 2003
  4. Teffy
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    636
    Markus Ernst
    Oct 16, 2003
  5. Teffy
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    517
    Sid Ismail
    Nov 10, 2003
Loading...

Share This Page