S
Steve Crook
Hi all,
Please excuse me if my question is a little off-topic for this group but
the level of activity in here suggests it's a good place to ask an HTML
related question.
I'm the current maintainer of the Usenet filtering software, Cleanfeed.
(http://www.mixmin.net/cleanfeed)
At the moment, Cleanfeed places HTML postings to Usenet into four
categories:
MIME posts with HTML attached files
HTML posts (Content-Type: Text/HTML)
MIME Multipart/Alternatives with HTML components
Any HTML with embedded <img src=> tags
In general Multipart HTML is broadly accepted across Usenet providing a
Text alternative is included. Image tags are rejected everywhere,
except the microsoft hierarchy where pretty much anything goes. The
same is True for non-MIME Text/HTML content.
I'm in the process of refining some of the HTML filters and would
appreciate some feedback on what groups/sub-hierarchies should be
exempted from these rules. One simple approach would be to allow HTML
to any group with a '.html' element in its name but I'm sure there are
exceptions to such a simple statement. Embedded images are another area
where I'd appreciate views on their acceptability.
Steve
Please excuse me if my question is a little off-topic for this group but
the level of activity in here suggests it's a good place to ask an HTML
related question.
I'm the current maintainer of the Usenet filtering software, Cleanfeed.
(http://www.mixmin.net/cleanfeed)
At the moment, Cleanfeed places HTML postings to Usenet into four
categories:
MIME posts with HTML attached files
HTML posts (Content-Type: Text/HTML)
MIME Multipart/Alternatives with HTML components
Any HTML with embedded <img src=> tags
In general Multipart HTML is broadly accepted across Usenet providing a
Text alternative is included. Image tags are rejected everywhere,
except the microsoft hierarchy where pretty much anything goes. The
same is True for non-MIME Text/HTML content.
I'm in the process of refining some of the HTML filters and would
appreciate some feedback on what groups/sub-hierarchies should be
exempted from these rules. One simple approach would be to allow HTML
to any group with a '.html' element in its name but I'm sure there are
exceptions to such a simple statement. Embedded images are another area
where I'd appreciate views on their acceptability.
Steve