HTML preprocessor

[Jonathan N. Little]

aa wrote:

Please stop top post and trim irrelevant bits.

Good, now I think we talk the same language
"list the url to each page with respect to search words" - no need EACH
page to be listed
Get just home page to be listed but list high. It is better to have 1 page
on the first SE page then 10 pages on SE's 10th page

This is rubbish, most SE rank high because of interconnectivity and
quantity of content.

Pages on a site have different relevance to a subject searched. So indexing
one the most relevant should suffice. Letting SE going to other pages dilute
relevance and therefore ranking.

My point is if the links to your "other" pages on your site are inserted
via JavaScript they *will not* be visible to the SE. Result will be
the SE will only see your home page the other page will not be indexed(
processed and ranked).

Of cource if a SE's algorithm ranks sites basing on the number of pages on
the site then indeed you need to let him know about the other pages. But
links to other pages are present in the text of the page outside navigation
anyway.

If you use JavaScript to manage your site's navigation (CMS) and you
have to hard code duplicate all the links this is hardly efficient!

Disclaimer. This here post is my personal opinion and as such doe s not
preted to be the Most Correct One
PS. If you do not use JS in navigation could you please refer me to an
example to such a navigation?

Server-side scripting SSI, PHP includes, ASP includes, MySql or other
database CMS... anything *not* client-side.

 

[dorayme]

Good, now I think we talk the same language

Please do me a favour and bottom post. I say this out of concern
for your welfare, I am watching out that you don't get beaten up
too badly and if I am to look out for you, it helps to bottom
post.

What's all this about preprocessors? Why trouble your head? How
many pages are you dealing with?

 

[aa]

quantity of content.

No doubt about quality of content. Not so sure about interconnectivity. With
other sites - yes, some SE take this into account.
One-page site with a good contents can get on the top of listing

My point is if the links to your "other" pages on your site are inserted
via JavaScript they *will not* be visible to the SE.

This is a crazy point. Look at the beginning of the thread. It is about
inserting navigation, footer and header. Only in nightmare one can imagine
insterting links in the text of a page using JS and spend time on seriosly
fighting this idea!
It looks like you got that hot only because you did not understand what I
said - sorry for that

Server-side scripting SSI, PHP includes, ASP includes, MySql or other
database CMS... anything *not* client-side.

You English seems to be even worse than mine
I did not ask for technique used to include a file
I asked for a link to an examle of a navigation menu which does not use JS.
And Flash of course as your love to JS is the same as to Flash, I guess

 

[aa]

What about them?

 

[dorayme]

What about them?

Seems like it was someone else who was seeking such, the OP. You
came into the thread without quoting with a one word question. I
suppose your branch in this thread is off at a tangent.

Please be careful how you post, bottom post and quote enough of
the context so others can follow. I like your writing and you are
now my temporary replacement for Luigi...

Anyway, I have gained from this little misunderstanding by
googling up the thread in date order and noticing Jim Moe's
mention of PHP as a generator (executable). I run a server on my
own machine here and PHP and can see the fruits of my includes
off line. But I don't always have the server on, and when not, I
use a copy of my websites that are the full text quid, that is,
sans php include instructions. This is a bit of a bore but not
that hard to maintain, having had years of using Find and Replace
functions to deck out my pages at a few strokes. I am wondering
if a PHP executable will run on a Mac to, at an even simpler
stroke, generate the full text quid.

How's my English?

 

[Jonathan N. Little]

"Jonathan N. Little" <[email protected]>

You English seems to be even worse than mine
I did not ask for technique used to include a file
I asked for a link to an examle of a navigation menu which does not use JS.
And Flash of course as your love to JS is the same as to Flash, I guess

My site.

 

[aa]

How's my English?

If this is pure English exercise then to my your En is just fine.
As to semantics, I am at a loss why you adress all this stuff to me and what
relevance this speach has to what I said. It looks like you still in
confusion and take me for someone else. It's Friday night!

 

[aa]

My site.

http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
As I already advised you in another thread, on that page I only see a
tomnstone which is unclickable and no other navigation except an instruction
to click some disk somewhere. Indeed it does not use JS or Flash, but if you
call it navigation then I better stay with JS for JS leaves without
navigation part of the visitors, but you leave all of them in the dark.

 

[dorayme]

If this is pure English exercise then to my your En is just fine.
As to semantics, I am at a loss why you adress all this stuff to me and what
relevance this speach has to what I said. It looks like you still in
confusion and take me for someone else. It's Friday night!

It is Saturday morning and very fine weather indeed. Second, I
told you I mistook you for the OP and went on from there to
babble uncontrollably. What's the problem?

 

[aa]

told you I mistook you for the OP and went on from there to
babble uncontrollably. What's the problem?

No problem. I just thought that in the last message you already noticed you
were babbling uncontrollably and wanted to put it under control.
If you wish to keep babbling - no problem with me. This is a free country
and freedom of speech after all. I tell you more: I even have no problems if
you top-babble or bottom-babble

 

[dorayme]

No problem. I just thought that in the last message you already noticed you
were babbling uncontrollably and wanted to put it under control.
If you wish to keep babbling - no problem with me. This is a free country
and freedom of speech after all. I tell you more: I even have no problems if
you top-babble or bottom-babble

I beg you to say that bit about freedom again, it is like music
to my ears. I can scarcely believe my luck.

 

[aa]

You do not need to ask me to repeat.
Just refresh you browser and enjoy yourself. You have the hole night for
that

 

[Toby Inkster]

I am wondering if a PHP executable will run on a Mac to

I have PHP on my Mac, though it's only PHP 4. (I keep meaning to upgrade
it to PHP 5.1, which is what I have on my server.) It runs fine from the
command line -- no web server required.

 

[dorayme]

I have PHP on my Mac, though it's only PHP 4. (I keep meaning to upgrade
it to PHP 5.1, which is what I have on my server.) It runs fine from the
command line -- no web server required.

Right, that is encouraging, thanks.

 

[dorayme]

You do not need to ask me to repeat.
Just refresh you browser and enjoy yourself. You have the hole night for
that

This is in spite of that

i. I am not looking at it in a browser

ii. I told you it is Sat morning and

iii. You know I want you to bottom post to make it easy on me.

But I think I am falling head over heels in love with you anyway.
See how blind love can be?

 

[mbstevens]

This is in spite of that

i. I am not looking at it in a browser

ii. I told you it is Sat morning and

iii. You know I want you to bottom post to make it easy on me.

But I think I am falling head over heels in love with you anyway.
See how blind love can be?

This is your father. You do realize that this is the kind of young man
who will do anything to get his business on the front page of the phone
book, don't you? Pull yourself together, girl!

 

[dorayme]

This is your father. You do realize that this is the kind of young man
who will do anything to get his business on the front page of the phone
book, don't you? Pull yourself together, girl!

....but... <splutter... cough> .... Dad, he will be rich and
famous, surely? You always said to pick someone with a bit more
get up and go than "that deadbeat" I was hanging about with a
while back. The one that took me to see films like:

"Six You Get Egg Roll", Doris Day!

 

[Ed Mullen]

...but... <splutter... cough> .... Dad, he will be rich and
famous, surely? You always said to pick someone with a bit more
get up and go than "that deadbeat" I was hanging about with a
while back. The one that took me to see films like:

"Six You Get Egg Roll", Doris Day!

I hesitate to contribute this but, the phrase "Stranger In A Strange
Land" leaps to mind. You Grok?

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.

 

[dorayme]

...but... <splutter... cough> .... Dad, he will be rich and
famous, surely? You always said to pick someone with a bit more
get up and go than "that deadbeat" I was hanging about with a
while back. The one that took me to see films like:

"Six You Get Egg Roll", Doris Day!

I hesitate to contribute this but, the phrase "Stranger In A Strange
Land" leaps to mind. You Grok?[/QUOTE]


You flatter me, Earthling! I know this for sure, aa does not grok
best practice website building standards.

 

[mbstevens]

I hesitate to contribute this but, the phrase "Stranger In A Strange
Land" leaps to mind. You Grok?

Does that ever date you!