L
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Subtle...
S
Stefan Behnel
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 16.03.2010 08:40:
Absolutely.
Python 2.4.6 (#2, Jan 21 2010, 23:45:25)
[GCC 4.4.1] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: No module named antigravity
Stefan
Absolutely.
Python 2.4.6 (#2, Jan 21 2010, 23:45:25)
[GCC 4.4.1] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
ImportError: No module named antigravity
Stefan
C
Chris Rebert
You're a bit behind the times.
If my calculations are right, that comic is over 2 years old.
Cheers,
Chris
C
Chris Rebert
U
Ulrich Eckhardt
Chris said:
import timetravel
Uli
C
Chris Rebert
So that's where Guido's been hiding his infamous time machine! Right
in plain sight!
It's so obvious in retrospect.
Cheers,
Chris
A
Alf P. Steinbach
* Ulrich Eckhardt:
C:\test> python
Python 3.1.1 (r311:74483, Aug 17 2009, 17:02:12) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
Cheers,
- Alf
C:\test> python
Python 3.1.1 (r311:74483, Aug 17 2009, 17:02:12) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
Cheers,
- Alf
H
Hans Mulder
Ulrich said:
I think you mean:
from __future__ import timetravel
-- HansM
M
Martin P. Hellwig
Well according to Marty it is:
from __back_to_the_future import DeLorean
M
Mark Lawrence
Hans said:
Taking 1984 into account surely it should be
from __past__ import __future__ as future
But the question is, have we yet got to 1984, are we currently there or
have we already gone past it? Who actually *IS* running the time
machine? Are there any bugs??
Regards.
Mark Lawrence.
M
Michael Rudolf
Am 16.03.2010 21:44, schrieb Mark Lawrence:
My is. And as I'm a lazy hacker: sure. there are bugs. lets just call
them features and move on. nothing to see here
My is. And as I'm a lazy hacker: sure. there are bugs. lets just call
them features and move on. nothing to see here
S
Stefan Behnel
Michael Rudolf, 17.03.2010 00:48:
I'll know it, I'll just know it!
Stefan
Am 16.03.2010 21:44, schrieb Mark Lawrence:
My is. And as I'm a lazy hacker: sure. there are bugs. lets just call
them features and move on. nothing to see here
I'll know it, I'll just know it!
Stefan
L
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
In message <[email protected]>, Chris
Rebert wrote:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
Rebert wrote:
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
S
Stefan Behnel
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 18.03.2010 08:49:
I hope you just had a bad day. Threatening others for figuring out your
e-mail address is even worse than posting with an illegal e-mail address.
Stefan
I hope you just had a bad day. Threatening others for figuring out your
e-mail address is even worse than posting with an illegal e-mail address.
Stefan
A
Alf P. Steinbach
* Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
Hi.
Chris Rebert didn't reveal anything not already present in the posting he
replied to, and indeed in the posting I'm replying to here.
The headers in the article I'm replying to (yours) look like this:
<headers source="your article">
Path:
feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]_zealand>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: import antigravity
Followup-To: comp.lang.python
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:49:55 +1300
Organization: Geek Central
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-14-26.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1268898595 20084 118.92.14.26 (18 Mar 2010 07:49:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.3.4
Xref: eternal-september.org comp.lang.python:51777
</headers>
One must assume that you were not aware that you're posting your mail address in
plaintext in every article?
Cheers & hth.,
- Alf
Hi.
Chris Rebert didn't reveal anything not already present in the posting he
replied to, and indeed in the posting I'm replying to here.
The headers in the article I'm replying to (yours) look like this:
<headers source="your article">
Path:
feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]_zealand>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: import antigravity
Followup-To: comp.lang.python
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:49:55 +1300
Organization: Geek Central
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 118-92-14-26.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 1268898595 20084 118.92.14.26 (18 Mar 2010 07:49:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.3.4
Xref: eternal-september.org comp.lang.python:51777
</headers>
One must assume that you were not aware that you're posting your mail address in
plaintext in every article?
Cheers & hth.,
- Alf
S
Stefan Behnel
Alf P. Steinbach, 18.03.2010 09:53:
Uhm - where?
Stefan
Uhm - where?
Stefan
A
Alf P. Steinbach
* Stefan Behnel:
Well, at least the one that Chris Rebert quoted,
<mailto:[email protected]_zealand> (in the 'From:' header).
The point is, if he's upset about Chris quoting that, then he's probably unaware
that he's posting it in plaintext himself.
Cheers,
- Alf
Well, at least the one that Chris Rebert quoted,
<mailto:[email protected]_zealand> (in the 'From:' header).
The point is, if he's upset about Chris quoting that, then he's probably unaware
that he's posting it in plaintext himself.
Cheers,
- Alf
J
Jussi Piitulainen
Alf said:
The complaint was not about quoting but about using in public. Chris
sent his piece to three addresses. From his headers, redacted:
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
To: "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <[email protected].[REDACTED]>
Cc: (e-mail address removed)
Can we stop importing red herrings now?
A
Alf P. Steinbach
* Jussi Piitulainen:
Oh, I didn't see that -- it's Bad Practice so I didn't look for it.
Cheers,
- Alf
Oh, I didn't see that -- it's Bad Practice so I didn't look for it.
Cheers,
- Alf
S
Steven D'Aprano
No, this is hardly the first time that Lawrence has made such a
wankerific threat:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg245012.html
I sympathise, because many years ago I lost an email address, made
unusable by spam, after using it unobfuscated in Usenet. But I think that
the spammers have mostly moved on these days. The pickings are much
richer for hijacking people's address books in Hotmail, Facebook or
Outlook, and the state of the art of anti-spam is better too. So I think
that Lawrence needs to HTFU and stop making empty threats over something
so trivial.