Is an extension of ".xslt2" a must for xslt stylesheets of spec 2.0 ?

Discussion in 'XML' started by Ken Philips, Sep 22, 2004.

  1. Ken Philips

    Ken Philips Guest

    If I want to use featurwes of Xslt Spec 2.0: Do I have to use an extension
    of .xslt2 or can use .xslt as well?

    Ken
     
    Ken Philips, Sep 22, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Re: Is an extension of ".xslt2" a must for xslt stylesheets of spec2.0 ?

    Ken Philips wrote:

    > If I want to use featurwes of Xslt Spec 2.0: Do I have to use an extension
    > of .xslt2 or can use .xslt as well?
    >
    > Ken
    >
    >
    >


    Ken i do not think the file extension tells something about the used tag.
    Xsl files are Xml files and can have any extension, but mostyle xsl is used.

    In the xsl file itself you define wich spec you use. See the spec how to
    do that, i dont know it exactly ;-)
     
    Tjerk Wolterink, Sep 22, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ken Philips
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    477
    John Keyes
    Sep 23, 2004
  2. Philippe Poulard
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    423
    Philippe Poulard
    Dec 4, 2003
  3. Harry Zoroc
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    847
    Boris Poehlmann
    Sep 23, 2004
  4. Paulo Pinto
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    760
    Paulo Pinto
    Feb 18, 2005
  5. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    690
  6. Gilgamesh

    XSLT from a XSD spec.

    Gilgamesh, Oct 4, 2006, in forum: XML
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    682
    Manuel Collado
    Oct 5, 2006
  7. Une bévue

    gem spec and C Ruby extension

    Une bévue, Aug 30, 2006, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    155
    Une bévue
    Aug 30, 2006
  8. Andrew Chen
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    361
    David Chelimsky
    Mar 25, 2008
Loading...