K
kevin bailey
hi there,
is xmlspy way ahead of everyone else?
i work on a linux workstation and use vmware/windows 2000 to work with
windows based clients.
i have been able to carry out a couple of basic xml projects using emacs
but we now have a project involving imported schemas.
when checking out tools it looks to me like xmlspy are way ahead of the
other tools.
is this impression correct?
are there any other tools which can be recommended.
i know i can use xerces to validate schemas but emacs psgml mode is
definitely struggling,
kev bailey
is xmlspy way ahead of everyone else?
i work on a linux workstation and use vmware/windows 2000 to work with
windows based clients.
i have been able to carry out a couple of basic xml projects using emacs
but we now have a project involving imported schemas.
when checking out tools it looks to me like xmlspy are way ahead of the
other tools.
is this impression correct?
are there any other tools which can be recommended.
i know i can use xerces to validate schemas but emacs psgml mode is
definitely struggling,
kev bailey