J
jacob navia
<< QUOTE
It is NOT a C compiler, because it doesn't conform to any commonly
accepted C specification (K&R, C89, C99). You have no right to call it
a C compiler until you get it to conform
quote >>
lcc-win32 provokes unexpected passions in some people using this
newsgroup. It is a H compiler then (H for heretical, non-orthodox)
<< QUOTE
It's been 12 years since I've used a binary tree the last time. In the
meantime, the most complex data structure I *needed* to use was an array
of structures. And I suspect that many programmers use linked lists
only in their homework assignments.
quote >>
The H compiler is not heretical by chance. I am heretical too. I have
to confess to you now that I do use hash tables, lists, and many other
structures in my day-to-day programming.
Worst, I am convinced that designing clever data structures is the best
of the programming activity.
You can get a copy of the H compiler from:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
It is NOT a C compiler, because it doesn't conform to any commonly
accepted C specification (K&R, C89, C99). You have no right to call it
a C compiler until you get it to conform
quote >>
lcc-win32 provokes unexpected passions in some people using this
newsgroup. It is a H compiler then (H for heretical, non-orthodox)
<< QUOTE
It's been 12 years since I've used a binary tree the last time. In the
meantime, the most complex data structure I *needed* to use was an array
of structures. And I suspect that many programmers use linked lists
only in their homework assignments.
quote >>
The H compiler is not heretical by chance. I am heretical too. I have
to confess to you now that I do use hash tables, lists, and many other
structures in my day-to-day programming.
Worst, I am convinced that designing clever data structures is the best
of the programming activity.
You can get a copy of the H compiler from:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32