"Mr." Travis wrote
(in article said:
Large file support is a compiler (or at least a linker) issue, not an OS
issue. The issue arises regardless of the target platform.
Only in the sense that no matter what the limit for file size
is, it's theoretically possible to try to create a file larger
than that supported. Even if you had 256-bit file offsets, you
could still (in theory) create a file larger than that.
But, in the real world, quite a few platforms support 64-bit
offsets natively. It is much more a file system issue than a
compiler issue. "LFS" never comes up on many of them. For
example, 64-bit Linux does not require anything special, but
32-bit Linux does. None of this has anything to do with c.l.c,
which is why Jack said to try another group. In fact, support
for "large files" is already in Windows, just not using standard
APIs, which are also off topic here.
In the time it took you to write that whiny complaint, you could have
composed an answer.
What makes you think Jack (or anyone else) automatically knows
the right answer? more importantly, in a newsgroup where a
reasonable percentage of the readers do not know (i.e. in a
group where the subject is off-topic), and incorrect response is
much less likely to be caught be the regulars. That is why it
is important to ask the question in an appropriate group, so
that you get the best results and do not receive incorrect or
misleading information.
You're clearly more interested in being an
OBSTRUCTIONIST ASSHOLE than engaging in constructive conversation.
PLONK
Here's a free clue: Klein is now in one killfile, you will
probably be in dozens by the end of the day.