: >: >: >: >
: >: >: The SSI will work just fine on most all capable web servers, and is free.
: >: >:
: >: >So you are ok with having mulitple <HEAD>,<TILE>, and <BODY> tags
: >: >in the generated document?
: >:
: >: Why do you ask? The files included via the SSI don't have those tags
: >: in them, just the content that needs including. So it's a non issue.
: >:
: >That was the question of the original poster. To include an HTML file.
:
: The OP was looking for a frames replacement. Your solution is server
: side and so would involve reloading the whole page, not just the
: content portion.
:
Ok, but that was not my interpretation...
: The include file can and should contain only that HTML which is
: needed. If they want to include an entire HTML file that they can not
: edit (e.g. one from another server) then either some form of server
: side scraping and reformatting is required, or another techonology
: (<object>, <iframe> or even, heavens forbid, frames) would be used.
:
I have no objection to the intended use of #include. I am only sugesting
an alternative to include anything.htm.
: Can your system include files from another server altogether? Say I
: wanted to include a page from Yahoo in the middle of one of my pages
: (let's ignore the copyright issues for now).
:
No and for obvious reasons.
: >If the include file contains some HTML mark up, how would you get a
: >preview without running it through the web server each time?
:
: Local development server.
So do I.
:
: > The
: >@charm:html tag is specialized to include an HTML file so that you can
: >edit and preview the file, in-tact.
:
: Why would you want to preview the content of your include file out of
: context of the whole page? Surely it wouldn't make any sense to just
: preview a nav bar, for example, without seeing how that nav bar
: interacted with the rest of the page.
I just want to quickly check that the syntax is correct and to identify
any potential problems early on. If there was a problem when viewed in
context, it would be more difficult to isolate which include file contains the
culprit. But that is by choice.
: >: >If your ISP is WebCharm-enabled, would it cost you anything?
: >:
: >: Can you provide a list of WebCharm enabled web hosts?
: >: I don't see why anyone would need to change their ISP, just their
: >: hosting solution.
: >:
: >The product is very new and we are working on partnering with ISPs
: >so that WebCharm can be made available. We are open to ideas on
: >the best way to do this.
:
: Not spamming newsgroups would be my first suggestion.
:
Ok, would it be ok if I post my how-to series say once every few days?
Long
www.edgesoft.ca/go/index.html