L
brucie, calm down.
It's only usenet.
brucie said:In alt.html Lemming said:
Henry said:I'll keep my eyes on ya, OK?
Seems you have acquired yourself a troll brucie.
We told you not to feed it. They *always* follow you home.
i hope he lasts longer than the last one.
Henry wrote:
BTW. Yahoo has nearly indentical menu as on your page, just different
colours and... SMALLER FONTS.
Neal said:You provide the value Yahoo does, you can get away with a lot.
Do you?
If brucie can't see these ones, how he can see at Yahoo?
You love these huge fonts?
Alan Cole said:chlori <[email protected]> said:Hello
Is the menu (http://www.alz-maschinen.ch/vorschlag1/)
readable and usable in 'every' browser/OS? Any
accessibility issues?
Can someone test with older browsers on a MAC and make
a screencap?
Thanks
chlori
Looks fine here on a Mac (Modern browsers not old ones.)
Al.
--
Alan Cole. E-mail: justal at lineone dot net
http://www.forces-of-nature.co.uk [Coastal Sports]
http://www.tsunami-site-design.co.uk [Website Design]
http://tinyurl.com/64xrd [Plusnet ISP]
brucie schrieb am 05.11.2004 10:42:
<h1 alt="blah"></h1> doesn't validate in XHTML 1.0 Strict.
Isn't <h1><img src="" alt="blah" ...></h1> good enough?
· your logo should be in a <h1> with alt text of whatever the image
says. only one <h1> per page, use less important <hx> as required
through the page.
brucie said:In alt.html Henry said:
who said yahoo invokes the bug or that i use yahoo anyway?
what huge fonts? the bug is with the text size set to 'smallest'. yahoo
has problems with some of the text but not enough to make it totally
unusable like chloris menu.
the fix is very simple instead of using ems use % for chlori that would
be 90%; instead of .9em;
you're a fucking idiot.
The text is _grossly_ too small.
Moreover, there's no obvious indication that the links
are links. They resemble too much the normal (non-link)
text in the logo.
Moreover, the image on the page looks as if there were for
images that are links, since in common browsers, image link
by default have blue border around them.
The currently chosen page's entry in the list is shown as different from
the rest, quite correctly. But it's still a link. A page should not
contain a link to itself - it's confusing.
On the positive side, the link texts themselves, verbally, constitute a
fairly good menu - even I can understand what the items are, and my
German is rather rusty. And it's properly written as <ul> at the markup
level, so that non-graphic browsers will present it suitably, except for
the feature that one of the links points to the page itself and is in no
way different from the other links (when CSS is not in use).
· common problem with those types of menus is falling apart with small
windows and/or large fonts. perhaps a min-width in ems so it adjusts
with the font size (min-width not supported by IE) but then you'll get
icky horizontal scroll bars.
Henry said:brucie wrote:
I know it doesn't look good at all,
but you can still read the links and use them, can't you?
its fine i like it. for some people using IE it will be crappy but
changing:
.navlist{font-size:0.9em;} to .navlist{font-size:90%;}
fixes the problem.
Your troll is at a loss for words
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.