minor changes to division demo

Discussion in 'HTML' started by Richard, Nov 3, 2003.

  1. Richard

    Richard Guest

    Richard, Nov 3, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Hywel Jenkins, Nov 3, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Richard

    Richard Guest

    Richard, Nov 3, 2003
    #3
  4. Richard

    Kris Guest

    In article <>,
    "Richard" <> wrote:

    > >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    >
    > >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    >
    > >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    >
    > > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    >
    > What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
    > browser.


    I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
    system. How can that get any better?

    (yeah, I know, I should buy Panther)

    --
    Kris
    erlands (nl)
    Kris, Nov 3, 2003
    #4
  5. In article <>,
    says...
    > Hywel Jenkins wrote:
    >
    > > In article <>,
    > > says...
    > >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    >
    > >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    >
    > >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    >
    > > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    >
    > What the hell are you using?


    Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    specifically for it.

    > What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
    > browser.


    And if I was your customer I'd consider getting a better web developer.
    Inn fact, I'd be considering getting *a* web developer.

    --
    Hywel I do not eat quiche
    http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
    http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php
    Hywel Jenkins, Nov 3, 2003
    #5
  6. Kris wrote:

    > In article <>,


    > "Richard" <> wrote:


    >> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html


    >> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.


    >> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.


    >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)


    >> What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
    >> browser.


    > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    > to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
    > system. How can that get any better?


    Same thing, here, in Mozilla 1.1, Opera 6.10 and Konqueror 3.0.3. Those
    are the only better browsers I have.

    --
    Blinky - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Linux RU 297263
    Microsoft, 23 Oct: "As a result of challenges to our business model,
    sales of our products may decline, we may have to reduce the prices
    we charge for our products..." http://snipurl.com/open_source
    Blinky the Shark, Nov 3, 2003
    #6
  7. Kris wrote:

    > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    > to be the most modern webbrowser


    Safari 1.0 - June 2003.

    More modern:

    Opera 7.21 - 14 October 2003.
    Mozilla 1.5 - 15 October 2003.

    --
    Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
    Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?id=132
    Toby A Inkster, Nov 3, 2003
    #7
  8. Richard

    Kris Guest

    In article <>,
    Toby A Inkster <> wrote:

    > > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    > > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    > > to be the most modern webbrowser

    >
    > Safari 1.0 - June 2003.
    >
    > More modern:
    >
    > Opera 7.21 - 14 October 2003.
    > Mozilla 1.5 - 15 October 2003.


    Don't confuse release with upgrade or patch. :p

    --
    Kris
    erlands (nl)
    Kris, Nov 3, 2003
    #8
  9. Richard

    Richard Guest

    Hywel Jenkins wrote:

    > In article <>,
    > says...
    >> Hywel Jenkins wrote:


    >> > In article <>,

    >>
    >> > says...
    >> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html


    >> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.


    >> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.


    >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)


    >> What the hell are you using?


    > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    > specifically for it.


    Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
    Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
    www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
    even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.
    BTW, I just downloaded the latest version.

    >> What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
    >> browser.


    > And if I was your customer I'd consider getting a better web
    > developer.
    > Inn fact, I'd be considering getting *a* web developer.


    > --
    > Hywel I do not eat quiche
    > http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
    > http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php
    Richard, Nov 4, 2003
    #9
  10. Richard

    rf Guest

    "Richard" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Hywel Jenkins wrote:
    >
    > > In article <>,
    > > says...
    > >> Hywel Jenkins wrote:

    >
    > >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    >
    > >> What the hell are you using?

    >
    > > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    > > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    > > specifically for it.

    >
    > Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
    > Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
    > www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
    > even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.
    > BTW, I just downloaded the latest version.


    Yeah, so? What happens when you scroll down? It looks exactly the same as
    the image Hywel posted I'll bet, that is, broken.

    If any newbie actually used this example they would be instantly back here
    asking what the bloody hell is going wrong with it. It is an extreemely poor
    demo, not only broken as far as good usage is concerned but broken as far as
    any layout considerations are concerned. If anybody actually put some real
    content into it it yould brake far more spectacularly.

    Cheers
    Richard.
    rf, Nov 4, 2003
    #10
  11. Richard

    informant Guest

    "Hywel Jenkins" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > In article <>,
    > says...
    > > www.1-large-world.com/div2.html
    > >
    > > At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.
    > >
    > > Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    >
    > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)


    That's the problem with Bullis. He's always wrong, gives bad advice,
    backtalks, and he just won't stop. He's definitely rubbish.
    informant, Nov 4, 2003
    #11
  12. Richard

    informant Guest

    "Hywel Jenkins" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > In article <>,
    > says...
    > > Hywel Jenkins wrote:
    > >
    > > > In article <>,
    > > > says...
    > > >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    > >
    > > >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    > >
    > > >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    > >
    > > > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > > > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    > >
    > > What the hell are you using?

    >
    > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    > specifically for it.
    >
    > > What ever it is I'd consider getting a better
    > > browser.

    >
    > And if I was your customer I'd consider getting a better web developer.
    > Inn fact, I'd be considering getting *a* web developer.


    Bullis is no web developer, he's just a k00k.
    informant, Nov 4, 2003
    #12
  13. Richard

    informant Guest

    "Kris" <> wrote in message
    news:4all.nl...
    > In article <>,
    > "Richard" <> wrote:
    >
    > > >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    > >
    > > >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    > >
    > > >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    > >
    > > > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > > > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    > >
    > > What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a

    better
    > > browser.

    >
    > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    > to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
    > system. How can that get any better?
    >
    > (yeah, I know, I should buy Panther)


    Bullis has no idea what you're talking about and is uninterested in
    learning. He'll keep mangling his little demo site despite all the good
    advice you give him.

    --
    Photos of Bullis
    http://www.lart.com/stupidrichard/
    http://convict.iwarp.com/bullis-single.jpg
    Richard Bullis FAQ 5.0
    http://www.lart.com/rtsfaq/

    The S.P.U.T.U.M. Lamers Gallery
    http://www.sputum.com/shame.html
    CENKOC Richard S. Bullis,
    Clueless Eternal Newbie Kook of the Century (Jan, 1901-Jan, 2001)
    informant, Nov 4, 2003
    #13
  14. Richard

    informant Guest

    "Blinky the Shark" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Kris wrote:
    >
    > > In article <>,

    >
    > > "Richard" <> wrote:

    >
    > >> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    >
    > >> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    >
    > >> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    >
    > >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    >
    > >> What the hell are you using? What ever it is I'd consider getting a

    better
    > >> browser.

    >
    > > I see the exact same thing in my Safari1.0/Mac OS 10.2.8.
    > > Before Panther (Mac OS 10.3) came out, several weeks ago, that happened
    > > to be the most modern webbrowser on the world's most advanced operating
    > > system. How can that get any better?

    >
    > Same thing, here, in Mozilla 1.1, Opera 6.10 and Konqueror 3.0.3. Those
    > are the only better browsers I have.


    You mean Bullis' IE6 is not the best browser? Why, it's the latest that
    Microsoft has put out and the rest of you guys better catch up.
    informant, Nov 4, 2003
    #14
  15. Richard

    informant Guest

    "rf" <> wrote in message
    news:m5Epb.177619$...
    >
    > "Richard" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > Hywel Jenkins wrote:
    > >
    > > > In article <>,
    > > > says...
    > > >> Hywel Jenkins wrote:

    > >
    > > >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > > >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    > >
    > > >> What the hell are you using?

    > >
    > > > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    > > > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    > > > specifically for it.

    > >
    > > Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
    > > Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
    > > www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
    > > even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.
    > > BTW, I just downloaded the latest version.

    >
    > Yeah, so? What happens when you scroll down? It looks exactly the same as
    > the image Hywel posted I'll bet, that is, broken.


    Bullis doesn't even comprehend what's wrong. You've seen his nasty side when
    offered good advice. He's too pig-headed to take it. He is a k00k.

    > If any newbie actually used this example they would be instantly back here
    > asking what the bloody hell is going wrong with it. It is an extreemely

    poor
    > demo, not only broken as far as good usage is concerned but broken as far

    as
    > any layout considerations are concerned. If anybody actually put some real
    > content into it it yould brake far more spectacularly.


    Oh, St00pid's broken numerous websites more spectacularly. Fortunately, they
    all ended up 404 compliant due to abuse or lack of payment.
    informant, Nov 4, 2003
    #15
  16. Richard

    kchayka Guest

    Richard wrote:
    >
    > Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
    > www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg
    > even at 800x600 it was still the same thing.


    Try increasing the text size a few notches and see how it starts falling
    apart. It's pretty ugly in smaller windows, mine's usually ~700px wide.

    --
    To email a reply, remove (dash)un(dash). Mail sent to the un
    address is considered spam and automatically deleted.
    kchayka, Nov 4, 2003
    #16
  17. Richard

    gmcclary Guest

    "Richard" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > www.1-large-world.com/div2.html
    >
    > At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.
    >
    > Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.
    >
    >


    Oh! Tell me, Dude, how to start some shit?

    ROFLOL

    (I'm still working on your previous code....)

    Glenn
    gmcclary, Nov 4, 2003
    #17
  18. Kris wrote:

    > Don't confuse release with upgrade or patch. :p


    Well, Safari is just an Apple port of Konqueror, which has been around
    since some time last millenium.

    --
    Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
    Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?id=132
    Toby A Inkster, Nov 4, 2003
    #18
  19. In article <>,
    says...
    > Hywel Jenkins wrote:
    >
    > > In article <>,
    > > says...
    > >> Hywel Jenkins wrote:

    >
    > >> > In article <>,
    > >>
    > >> > says...
    > >> >> www.1-large-world.com/div2.html

    >
    > >> >> At least now in netscrape 4.7 it almost looks decent.

    >
    > >> >> Yes I am using pixels because that's the way I want it.

    >
    > >> > Again, stop - you're rubbish:
    > >> > http://demo.hyweljenkins.co.uk/richard.jpg (28k)

    >
    > >> What the hell are you using?

    >
    > > Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or Mozilla 1.5. You're typical of most amateurs
    > > that think they're any good: you use Internet Explorer and you deisgn
    > > specifically for it.

    >
    > Bullshit. You can have your fun all you want.
    > Here's what I see in mozilla 1.5 with 1024x768.
    > www.1-large-world.com/div2a.jpg


    You've only shown the top part of the screen, which shows the sameas my
    screen shot. Scroll down fsckwit.

    --
    Hywel I do not eat quiche
    http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/
    http://hyweljenkins.co.uk/mfaq.php
    Hywel Jenkins, Nov 4, 2003
    #19
  20. Richard

    Kris Guest

    In article <>,
    "informant" <> wrote:

    > > (yeah, I know, I should buy Panther)

    >
    > Bullis has..


    Your sole existence in this group seem to revolve around bashing this
    guy Richard. Excuse me while I pro-actively purge your messages from my
    display, permanently.

    --
    Kris
    erlands (nl)
    Kris, Nov 4, 2003
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. VB Programmer

    Question: Minor personalization

    VB Programmer, May 25, 2004, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    321
    Hugo Wetterberg
    May 27, 2004
  2. F. GEIGER
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    1,218
    F. GEIGER
    May 3, 2004
  3. Andy Leszczynski

    wxPython demo /Process does not open new demo

    Andy Leszczynski, Feb 18, 2005, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    640
    Andy Leszczynski
    Feb 18, 2005
  4. Replies:
    94
    Views:
    4,488
    ┬Ča\\/b
    Feb 9, 2007
  5. EastvanAxon
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    795
    EastvanAxon
    Mar 14, 2012
Loading...

Share This Page