Mocking Objects with Typemock Isolator Mocking framework for .NetUnit Testing

Discussion in 'ASP .Net' started by mo.sparrow, Aug 22, 2008.

  1. mo.sparrow

    mo.sparrow Guest

    The advantages of unit testing are well known, giving development
    teams a safety net to facilitate change, ease integration and supply
    live documentation.Unit testing of small logical code is quite easy
    and can show value quickly.
    But in real life, our code will use other classes and components. If
    this happens, things can get quite fragile and the tests will quickly
    become system tests.
    Typemock Isolator enables developers to unit test all their code by
    magically disconnecting and isolating external components.
    Typemock Isolator uses aspect-oriented technology to redirect calls
    from the real code. This enables developers to define the behavior of
    the external component required for a tested scenario. For example,
    you can simulate that the disk is full when writing to a database by
    instructing Typemock Isolator to throw an OutOfDiskSpaceException when
    writing to the database. This is a scenario that will be nearly
    impossible to test without Typemock Isolator. The developer defines
    the behavior in the actual unit test and Typemock Isolator
    automatically isolates all required components.

    To learn more - http://www.typemock.com/Product.html
     
    mo.sparrow, Aug 22, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. gamename

    Unit Testing With Function Mocking

    gamename, Mar 16, 2007, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    1,098
    gamename
    Mar 19, 2007
  2. 7stud
    Replies:
    11
    Views:
    750
    Dennis Lee Bieber
    Mar 20, 2007
  3. Silfheed
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    349
    Silfheed
    Mar 30, 2007
  4. Fuzzyman
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    276
    Fuzzyman
    Aug 22, 2009
  5. mo.sparrow
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    96
    mo.sparrow
    Aug 22, 2008
Loading...

Share This Page