Y
yawnmoth
<http://www.quirksmode.org/book/printable/xmlhttp.txt> shows two
alternatives to Microsoft.XMLHTTP - Msxml2.XMLHTTP and Msxml3.XMLHTTP.
If my understanding is correct, the different numbers refer to the
version of Microsoft's XML parser and that Microsoft.XMLHTTP refers to
the latest installed version.
This makes me wonder why sites like
<http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/xmlhttpreq.html> opt to
use Msxml2.XMLHTTP, first, and then use Microsoft.XMLHTTP as a
fallback. If v2 was the latest version of the XML parser,
Microsoft.XMLHTTP would refer to it just as Msxml2.XMLHTTP does. If v3
or v4 were the latest versions, Microsoft.XMLHTTP would refer to either
of those. So why give v2 preference? Wouldn't it be better to use v4
and then v3, before using v2? Wouldn't it be better just to reference
Microsoft.XMLHTTP and not Msxml*.XMLHTTP?
alternatives to Microsoft.XMLHTTP - Msxml2.XMLHTTP and Msxml3.XMLHTTP.
If my understanding is correct, the different numbers refer to the
version of Microsoft's XML parser and that Microsoft.XMLHTTP refers to
the latest installed version.
This makes me wonder why sites like
<http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/xmlhttpreq.html> opt to
use Msxml2.XMLHTTP, first, and then use Microsoft.XMLHTTP as a
fallback. If v2 was the latest version of the XML parser,
Microsoft.XMLHTTP would refer to it just as Msxml2.XMLHTTP does. If v3
or v4 were the latest versions, Microsoft.XMLHTTP would refer to either
of those. So why give v2 preference? Wouldn't it be better to use v4
and then v3, before using v2? Wouldn't it be better just to reference
Microsoft.XMLHTTP and not Msxml*.XMLHTTP?