MVC - controller

Discussion in 'Java' started by VisionSet, Sep 23, 2004.

  1. VisionSet

    VisionSet Guest

    Briefly I have a controller that instantiates swing models and the view.
    The models are registered with the view, and further event driven updates
    are handled by swings internal event mechanism.
    The view has inner action classes that generally call the controller which
    initiates business processes. All standard stuff hopefully.

    Now in more detail.
    I have Swing models (eg ComboBoxModel, TableModel) that I have implemented
    as separate classes, extending AbstractTableModel for example. These are
    instantiated by the controller at startup and passed to the view which does
    eg myJTable.setModel(myTableModel).
    When an Action is triggered the views inner Action class calls the
    controller via a controller interface - decoupling controller and view.
    The controller then calls one of its TaskControllers which creates a new
    inner Task instance that threads a new long business process (network call)
    and then updates the GUI on the event thread.
    My Controller acts as Mediator? for View, Swing Models, and the

    The abstract Task class is similar to Suns SwingWorker class. It has two
    abstract methods one runs in a new thread and does the long task, the other
    is called at the end of the former but runs on the event thread to update
    the GUI (by updating the model).

    Originally my Controller was full of innerclass subclasses of Task.
    So I factored them out into there own top level classes.
    The controller creates an instance of a TaskManager at startup which has
    attribute such as SwingModels and the main Controller.
    When the controller decides to perform a business process it calls the task
    manager to do the task, the task manager has an inner Task subclass and one
    of these is instantiated each time the business process is required.

    I was trying to get away from inner classes, but it seems they perfect here,
    I didn't think it was a good idea to keep passing parameters where the
    reference is known to be unchanging.
    Therefore the TaskManager class is there soley to encapsulate the initial
    controller attributes relevent to the task it manages.

    Am I making any sense or do you want a link to UML?
    If all that is understandable, is it a sensible design?

    class Controller {

    TableModel aSwingModel;
    TaskManager tm;

    Controller() {
    tm = new TaskManager(aSwingModel);
    void doTask {

    class TaskManager {

    TableModel aSwingModel;

    doTask() {
    new Taskette();

    private class Taskette extends Task {
    // change and update aSwingModel

    Mike W
    VisionSet, Sep 23, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. VisionSet

    MVC: Controller for Swing

    VisionSet, Nov 5, 2003, in forum: Java
    Harald Hein
    Nov 5, 2003
  2. VisionSet

    MVC - controller

    VisionSet, Sep 28, 2004, in forum: Java
    Sep 28, 2004
  3. =?Utf-8?B?TG9yZW56byBKaW1lbmV6?=

    Is MS silent about MVC-Page controller for ASP.NET 2.0

    =?Utf-8?B?TG9yZW56byBKaW1lbmV6?=, May 31, 2006, in forum: ASP .Net
    bruce barker \(\)
    May 31, 2006
  4. Mike Gleason jr Couturier

    MVC - Multiple forms on same page using same controller action

    Mike Gleason jr Couturier, Mar 5, 2009, in forum: ASP .Net
    bruce barker
    Mar 6, 2009
  5. Michael Earls
    Mar 24, 2009

Share This Page