New C1X Draft

Discussion in 'C Programming' started by lawrence.jones@siemens.com, Feb 24, 2011.

  1. Guest

    There's a new draft (N1548) of the proposed C1X standard available on
    the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
    previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
    standard (N1256), which makes it easier to see what's new.

    <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1548.pdf>
    --
    Larry Jones

    Geez, I gotta have a REASON for everything? -- Calvin
     
    , Feb 24, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. writes:

    > There's a new draft (N1548) of the proposed C1X standard available on
    > the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
    > previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99
    > standard (N1256), which makes it easier to see what's new.


    That's a very useful change. Thank you.

    --
    Ben.
     
    Ben Bacarisse, Feb 24, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. In comp.std.c, article <>,
    wrote:

    > There's a new draft (N1548) of the proposed C1X standard available on
    > the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
    > previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99

    ^^^^^

    Thanks. Didn't you mean N1547? AFAIK, N1539 is even older, and
    different.

    --
    Vincent Lefèvre <> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
    100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
    Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
     
    Vincent Lefevre, Feb 25, 2011
    #3
  4. Guest

    In comp.std.c Vincent Lefevre <> wrote:
    > In comp.std.c, article <>,
    > wrote:
    >
    > > There's a new draft (N1548) of the proposed C1X standard available on
    > > the committee's web site. The text of this version is identical to the
    > > previous version (N1539), but the diff marks are against the final C99

    > ^^^^^
    >
    > Thanks. Didn't you mean N1547? AFAIK, N1539 is even older, and
    > different.


    Yes, you're right. Sorry for the confusion.
    --
    Larry Jones

    It COULD'VE happened by accident! -- Calvin
     
    , Feb 25, 2011
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Colby L. Canutt

    Need help finding LRM Draft

    Colby L. Canutt, Sep 3, 2004, in forum: VHDL
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    562
    Colby L. Canutt
    Sep 3, 2004
  2. Royt
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    896
    llothar
    Mar 16, 2008
  3. Robert Seacord

    improved C1X security

    Robert Seacord, Aug 11, 2008, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    461
    Richard Bos
    Aug 15, 2008
  4. Gennaro Prota
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    804
    Larry Evans
    Aug 25, 2010
  5. Gennaro Prota
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    408
    Francesco S. Carta
    Aug 26, 2010
  6. Ersek, Laszlo

    posting history -- wording of C1X sequencing

    Ersek, Laszlo, Sep 23, 2010, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    365
    Shao Miller
    Sep 24, 2010
  7. David Demelier

    Still no dirent.h in C1X

    David Demelier, Nov 24, 2011, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    44
    Views:
    1,194
    jacob navia
    Dec 2, 2011
  8. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    779
    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
    Mar 11, 2008
Loading...