News for Java freelancers, developers and companies

[Hooman]

Hello friends,

Please excuse me if I'm writing this message right here, but as I'm a
fan member of this Usenet, I thought maybe I can give back some useful
resources and interact more with you all.

JavaForce.com has introduced a new service for Java programmers and
developers to find outsourced projects online and earn money online,
at Java Freelancers (http://www.javaforce.com/component/
option,com_dailymessage/Itemid,86/).

The website is aimed to attract friends to have their feedbacks and
serve them with information and resources as much as possible.

In recent months, about 30 users have outsourced their Java and J2EE
related projects online in an average of $300 each. Also, about 40
users have offered their skills to such projects online and made an
average $100 extra income per week.

Visit http://www.javaforce.com/ for more news and resources.

Good Luck,
Hooman Taherinia

 

[Andrew Thompson]

Hello friends,

We are not your friends.

Please excuse me if I'm writing this message right here,

No, because..

..but as I'm a
fan member of this Usenet,

..if you a) understood usenet, or b) were a 'fan', you might
take a little more time *reading* it and realise that spam
such as your tripe is not welcome here (there, or indeed
anywhere).

So, not only are you a multi-posting spammer, but you are
also a lier, and/or a pillock.

..I thought maybe I can give back some useful
resources ..

You have nothing of use, to anyone.

Now p*ss off.

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Message posted via JavaKB.com
http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200711/1

 

[Hooman]

Thanks for review! Opinions are respected, but rarely your language.

Good luck,
Hoom
http://www.javaforce.com/

 

[Andrew Thompson]

Hooman wrote:

Please refrain from top-posting. Another thing you might have
noticed about these groups you are supposedly a 'fan' of, is
that top-posting is generally disliked.

Thanks for review!

You are welcome. You can expect something similar for
any more posts you make, along those lines.

..Opinions are respected, but rarely your language.

'Rarely'? Are you now claiming to be expert enough about
*my* use of language to determine how often I swear at
people who post here (that is rare) as opposed to me
swearing at lying/pillock multi-posting spammers, like
you (that is common-place)?

Of course, the very fact you would monitor your own post
and frame a reply to my objections, indicates you have at
least a little more sense than your average spammer. So
I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
and be encouraged to cease and desist making further
posts like that.

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Message posted via JavaKB.com
http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200711/1

 

[Hooman]

Hooman wrote:

Please refrain from top-posting. Another thing you might have
noticed about these groups you are supposedly a 'fan' of, is
that top-posting is generally disliked.


You are welcome. You can expect something similar for
any more posts you make, along those lines.


'Rarely'? Are you now claiming to be expert enough about
*my* use of language to determine how often I swear at
people who post here (that is rare) as opposed to me
swearing at lying/pillock multi-posting spammers, like
you (that is common-place)?

Of course, the very fact you would monitor your own post
and frame a reply to my objections, indicates you have at
least a little more sense than your average spammer. So
I hold a slim hope you can realise the error of your ways,
and be encouraged to cease and desist making further
posts like that.

Thanks for notice Andrew, I just *realized* that

 

[Dag Sunde]

Thanks for notice Andrew, I just *realized* that

You do *realise* that that there is a lot of *coulourful*
differences between British English and American English?

 

[Hooman]

You do *realise* that that there is a lot of *coulourful*
differences between British English and American English?

For sure, and I *realise* THAT THAT there is *COULOURFUL* mistakes and
misunderstandings right here!

 

[Dag Sunde]

For sure, and I *realise* THAT THAT there is *COULOURFUL* mistakes and
misunderstandings right here!

LOL!

 

[Lew]

LOL!

Isn't there some Usenet law that grammatical corrections (such as the
attempted "*realized*" are followed almost immediately by a grammatical
mistake from the corrector (failure to match subject and verb number in the
followup post)?