Now it validates!

[Richard]

All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
and it validates.
No errors.
<img name=""> is now recognized.
I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

 

[David Dorward]

I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

HTML 4.01 is the latest version of HTML, there are no plans to develop it
further. The new work is with XHTML. The specifications list the changes.

 

[Steve Pugh]

All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
and it validates.
No errors.
<img name=""> is now recognized.
I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the W3C
site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.

Steve

 

[kayodeok]

All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for
the images, and it validates.
No errors.
<img name=""> is now recognized.
I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

I assume you meant changes between HTML 4.0 and 4.01?

http://www.google.com/search?q=html+4.01+changes site:w3.org
Specifically:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/changes.html

 

[kayodeok]

You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the
W3C site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.

I think he meant changes between HTML 4.0 and HTML 4.01

 

[Marco Bakker]

All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
and it validates.
No errors.
<img name=""> is now recognized.
I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

But now you have another problem; this posting does not validate as
there is no such element as html 4.02.

 

[Tina - AffordableHOST.com]

You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the W3C
site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.

Steve

I think that's a typo. If you read his whole post, he originally says
"4.01"

--Tina

 

[Richard]

But now you have another problem; this posting does not validate as
there is no such element as html 4.02.

I swear you guys would be a riot at your favorite comedy club.
You'd nitpick on every word spoken.

 

[rf]

All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
and it validates.

I assume you are talking about this
http://1-large-world.com/stargate/movie/scrolltable3.html

If so then
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/test/movie/mozilla.jpg

Cheers
Richard.

 

[rf]

I swear you guys would be a riot at your favorite comedy club.
You'd nitpick on every word spoken.

<nitpick>
You didn't speak 4.02, you typed it
</nitpick>

Cheers
Richard.

 

[Richard]

rf wrote:

I assume you are talking about this
http://1-large-world.com/stargate/movie/scrolltable3.html

If so then
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/test/movie/mozilla.jpg

Cheers
Richard.

That's precisely why #4 was done.
Due to some errors I didn't see, you got that as output.
So I rewrote it.
Stay tuned for version 5.

 

[rf]

rf wrote:






That's precisely why #4 was done.
Due to some errors I didn't see, you got that as output.
So I rewrote it.
Stay tuned for version 5.

Nope. I'll wait for a real version that has some real content and actually
works, and for the user rather than against the user.

Cheers
Richard.