Now it validates!

Discussion in 'HTML' started by Richard, Jan 13, 2004.

  1. Richard

    Richard Guest

    All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
    and it validates.
    No errors.
    <img name=""> is now recognized.
    I wonder what change was made in 4.02?
     
    Richard, Jan 13, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Richard wrote:

    > I wonder what change was made in 4.02?


    HTML 4.01 is the latest version of HTML, there are no plans to develop it
    further. The new work is with XHTML. The specifications list the changes.

    --
    David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
     
    David Dorward, Jan 13, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Richard

    Steve Pugh Guest

    "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote:

    >All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
    >and it validates.
    >No errors.
    ><img name=""> is now recognized.
    >I wonder what change was made in 4.02?


    You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the W3C
    site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.

    Steve

    --
    "My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you,
    I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor

    Steve Pugh <> <http://steve.pugh.net/>
     
    Steve Pugh, Jan 13, 2004
    #3
  4. Richard

    kayodeok Guest

    "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in
    news::

    > All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for
    > the images, and it validates.
    > No errors.
    > <img name=""> is now recognized.
    > I wonder what change was made in 4.02?


    I assume you meant changes between HTML 4.0 and 4.01?

    http://www.google.com/search?q=html 4.01 changes site:w3.org
    Specifically:
    http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/changes.html
    --
    Kayode Okeyode
    http://www.kayodeok.co.uk/weblog/
    http://www.kayodeok.btinternet.co.uk/favorites/webdesign.htm
     
    kayodeok, Jan 13, 2004
    #4
  5. Richard

    kayodeok Guest

    Steve Pugh <> wrote in
    news::

    > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote:
    >
    >>All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for
    >>the images, and it validates.
    >>No errors.
    >><img name=""> is now recognized.
    >>I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

    >
    > You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the
    > W3C site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.


    I think he meant changes between HTML 4.0 and HTML 4.01
    --
    Kayode Okeyode
    http://www.kayodeok.co.uk/weblog/
    http://www.kayodeok.btinternet.co.uk/favorites/webdesign.htm
     
    kayodeok, Jan 13, 2004
    #5
  6. Richard

    Marco Bakker Guest

    Richard <anonymous@127.000> wrote:

    > All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the images,
    > and it validates.
    > No errors.
    > <img name=""> is now recognized.
    > I wonder what change was made in 4.02?


    But now you have another problem; this posting does not validate as
    there is no such element as html 4.02.

    --
    marco
     
    Marco Bakker, Jan 13, 2004
    #6
  7. "Steve Pugh" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote:
    >
    > >All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the

    images,
    > >and it validates.
    > >No errors.
    > ><img name=""> is now recognized.
    > >I wonder what change was made in 4.02?

    >
    > You're joking right? Probably not. A minute or two spent on the W3C
    > site would tell you that there is no HTML 4.02.
    >
    > Steve



    I think that's a typo. If you read his whole post, he originally says
    "4.01"

    --Tina

    --
    http://www.AffordableHOST.com
    20% Discount Code: newsgroup
    We transfer time from your current host!
    Serving the web since 1997
     
    Tina - AffordableHOST.com, Jan 13, 2004
    #7
  8. Richard

    Richard Guest

    Marco Bakker wrote:

    > Richard <anonymous@127.000> wrote:


    >> All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the
    >> images, and it validates. No errors. <img name=""> is now recognized. I
    >>wonder what change was made in 4.02?


    > But now you have another problem; this posting does not validate as
    > there is no such element as html 4.02.


    I swear you guys would be a riot at your favorite comedy club.
    You'd nitpick on every word spoken.
     
    Richard, Jan 13, 2004
    #8
  9. Richard

    rf Guest

    rf, Jan 14, 2004
    #9
  10. Richard

    rf Guest

    "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Marco Bakker wrote:
    >
    > > Richard <anonymous@127.000> wrote:

    >
    > > But now you have another problem; this posting does not validate as
    > > there is no such element as html 4.02.

    >
    > I swear you guys would be a riot at your favorite comedy club.
    > You'd nitpick on every word spoken.


    <nitpick>
    You didn't speak 4.02, you typed it :)
    </nitpick>

    Cheers
    Richard.
     
    rf, Jan 14, 2004
    #10
  11. Richard

    Richard Guest

    Richard, Jan 14, 2004
    #11
  12. Richard

    rf Guest

    "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
    news:...
    > rf wrote:
    >
    >
    > > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
    > > news:...
    > >> All I did was change html 4.0 to html 4.01, put in the "alt" for the

    > > images,
    > >> and it validates.

    >
    > > I assume you are talking about this
    > > http://1-large-world.com/stargate/movie/scrolltable3.html

    >
    > > If so then
    > > http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/test/movie/mozilla.jpg

    >
    > > Cheers
    > > Richard.

    >
    > That's precisely why #4 was done.
    > Due to some errors I didn't see, you got that as output.
    > So I rewrote it.
    > Stay tuned for version 5.


    Nope. I'll wait for a real version that has some real content and actually
    works, and for the user rather than against the user.

    Cheers
    Richard.
     
    rf, Jan 14, 2004
    #12
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Buddy Ackerman
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    487
  2. Titus A Ducksass - AKA broken-record
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    685
    Titus A Ducksass - AKA broken-record
    Nov 15, 2004
  3. Lyle Ladeira

    validates characters

    Lyle Ladeira, Jul 28, 2004, in forum: C++
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    318
    Ioannis Vranos
    Jul 30, 2004
  4. Jon   Paal

    license file never validates as true

    Jon Paal, Aug 30, 2006, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    312
    Jon Paal
    Aug 30, 2006
  5. Eric Lilja
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,552
    Joseph Kesselman
    Feb 21, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page