Obfuscator

J

JohnIGrant

What obfuscators handle 1.5? Any comparisons of obfuscators out there?

Thanks
John
 
J

javaobfuscator

A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse
engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator.
The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields
using aggressive obfuscator techniques
The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results
The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation
String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator
Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to
help track piracy

An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to
provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance.
The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant
pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded
class (forname) detection

Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code
development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5.
An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation
An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation
An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars
An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications,
libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc.
An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles
An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes
Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers
Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for
integrating into build environments.
The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide
The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods
The obfuscator should provide granular configuration.
 
J

javaobfuscator

A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse
engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator.
The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields
using aggressive obfuscator techniques
The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results
The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation
String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator
Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to
help track piracy

An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to
provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance.
The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant
pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded
class (forname) detection

Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code
development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5.
An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation
An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation
An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars
An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications,
libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc.
An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles
An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes
Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers
Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for
integrating into build environments.
The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide
The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods
The obfuscator should provide granular configuration.
The DashO java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com is a reasonable
choice as they focus on obfuscators
 
L

Luc The Perverse

A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse
engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator.
The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields
using aggressive obfuscator techniques
The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results
The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation
String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator
Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to
help track piracy

An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to
provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance.
The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant
pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded
class (forname) detection

Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code
development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5.
An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation
An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation
An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars
An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications,
libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc.
An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles
An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes
Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers
Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for
integrating into build environments.
The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide
The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods
The obfuscator should provide granular configuration.
The DashO java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com is a reasonable
choice as they focus on obfuscators

Spam?
 
S

Stefan Ram

Luc The Perverse said:

There is no need to completely quote advertisements
(unless you would get paid by the advertisers to do so).

I would not have seen this message at all, if you would not
have quoted it, because my message filter had suppressed it.
 
D

Dave Glasser


If you look at the headers on the original post, you'll see this:

Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=69.40.252.183;
posting-account=Tt-DIg0AAACUPbBpGjHTEvj2F_15rk5U


And in the headers of the two followups that came along in minutes,
you'll see:

Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=69.40.252.183;
posting-account=frIB1A0AAACdf_8g6USvS1A7aN5GX0sA

from "(e-mail address removed)", and

Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=69.40.252.183;
posting-account=7-pGhA0AAAAR2W065rHUrGOblwO8QYZN


from "(e-mail address removed)". The interesting thing is that they
all contain this:

posting-host=69.40.252.183

which suggests that they all three originated from the same machine.
So it looks like the two followups were sockpuppets on the hand of
"(e-mail address removed)".

Personally, I don't think it would have been out of line if the guy
just posted an announcement for his product. It is on-topic, after
all.


--
"If you are seriously interested in fighting for a better world,
begin by identifying the nature of the problem. The battle is
primarily intellectual (philosophical), not political. Politics
is the last consequence, the practical implementation, of the
fundamental (metaphysical-epistimological-ethical) ideas that
dominate a given nation's culture. You cannot fight or change
the consequences without fighting and changing the cause; nor
can you attempt any practical implementation without knowing
what you want to implement."

--Ayn Rand,
*Philosophy, Who Needs It*
 
J

Joan

in message

I just read that in South Korea the folks like spam (the one in
the tin.)
When we were poor (long time ago) we used to get a meat product
that
resembled spam, but was much less tastey.
 
L

Luc The Perverse

Joan said:
I just read that in South Korea the folks like spam (the one in the tin.)
When we were poor (long time ago) we used to get a meat product that
resembled spam, but was much less tastey.


I think society's public sentiment against spam led to the invention of a
new word, an acronym for unwanted advertising. The original acronym has
been all but lost but the word itself persists!
 
R

Roedy Green

I think society's public sentiment against spam led to the invention of a
new word, an acronym for unwanted advertising. The original acronym has
been all but lost but the word itself persists!

SPAM was originally canned ham. It is popular in Samoa. Monty Python
did a sketch about it where everything on the menu contains spam. That
lead to its metaphorical use as something ubiquitous you can't get
away from.
 
A

Andrew Thompson

Roedy said:
SPAM was originally canned ham.

No. Canned ham is *not* canned SPiced hAM.
..It is popular in Samoa.

I don't mind it here, either.

Recently*, the English company that coined the word
successfully stopped anti-spam software being released
with the word spam in the name.

* ..last year, or so?
 
G

Gordon Beaton

Recently*, the English company that coined the word
successfully stopped anti-spam software being released
with the word spam in the name.

Apparently Hormel has failed in its attempt to stop Spam Arrest:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/03/hormel_spam_campaign/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/31/spam_ruling/

However maybe you were thinking of this, where a self admitted spammer
tried to launch a line of "spam king" clothing:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/17/spam_king_roasting/

IANAL, but was under the impression that tradmarks were registered in
various specific categories, and that infringement could only occur if
there was a distinct possibility (or intent) of confusion between the
offendor and the original, which to me hardly seems likely between a
"meat" product and computer software or services.

Quoting from the first Register article above:

"When even legislation (e.g. the CAN-SPAM Act) uses the word spam as
a generic term for unsolicited commercial email it is time to
concede that a meaning, whether desirable or not, has become
ingrained in the language."

/gordon
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,744
Messages
2,569,484
Members
44,904
Latest member
HealthyVisionsCBDPrice

Latest Threads

Top