J
JohnIGrant
What obfuscators handle 1.5? Any comparisons of obfuscators out there?
Thanks
John
Thanks
John
A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse
engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator.
The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields
using aggressive obfuscator techniques
The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results
The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation
String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator
Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to
help track piracy
An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to
provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance.
The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant
pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded
class (forname) detection
Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code
development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5.
An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation
An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation
An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars
An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications,
libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc.
An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles
An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes
Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers
Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for
integrating into build environments.
The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide
The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods
The obfuscator should provide granular configuration.
The DashO java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com is a reasonable
choice as they focus on obfuscators
Luc The Perverse said:Spam?
Spam?
Spam?
Joan said:I just read that in South Korea the folks like spam (the one in the tin.)
When we were poor (long time ago) we used to get a meat product that
resembled spam, but was much less tastey.
I think society's public sentiment against spam led to the invention of a
new word, an acronym for unwanted advertising. The original acronym has
been all but lost but the word itself persists!
Roedy said:SPAM was originally canned ham.
..It is popular in Samoa.
Recently*, the English company that coined the word
successfully stopped anti-spam software being released
with the word spam in the name.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.